baldkarma79
Member
- Reaction score
- 6
This is why hair transplants aren't for everyone
Dr Woods may have invented FUE but his transplant results are sh*t! Unless you tranplant more than 65 to 70 grafts preferably more than 75 in the hairline the results look even more unatural and thats provided you have enough hair behind it to back it up.I wonder how much body hair and scalp donor he has? With his money, he could easily see a master like Dr Woods and improve it.
When you reach slick bald NW5 uncle-looking cuck status, you quickly understand (took me a couple of months I think) that it is worth it.
But you need to be bald to understand, especially if it's at a young age, you basically have no choice if you want to look semi-normal again.
My first hair transplant at the age of 24 (in 2014) was a gamble, but man, I was committed, I had to do it.
I'm having my second one in less than a couple of months and I'm quite excited.
Your math is wrong by the way, you conflate hair and graft several times. 10000 FU is roughly 25000 hairs (in doubt, multiply by 2.5).
It all depends on the individual, but personally, my hair is quite thick and messy (curly) so a relatively little number of grafts can already give the illusion of OK density.
Anyway, with minoxidil and my high sensitivity to hormonal changes (grew boobs), FUE's are almost all I have. After that, I could still use beard grafts for my crown and temporary SMP to slightly improve the illusion of density.
You got to work with what you have. My girlfriend asked me: "When are you going to stop, when will you think you have enough hair?"
My reply: "The day I can wake up in the morning and spike my hair up with gel like I did when I was 16."
Yeah, shame for the guy. All that money spent and his personal business all over the tabloids, and really nothing to show for it but a big scar.
A big scar? I was under the impression he had an FUE procedure.
What exactly went wrong for his transplant do you think?