can you link to that statement?
That they have no rejection in humans either or mice.
Update From The God Himself - Dr. Takashi Tsuji
- Thread starter kingjohn
- Start date
can you link to that statement?
That they have no rejection in humans either or mice.
So you just pulled something out of your ***.
Always good with some statements like that without being able to back it up.
There are multiple scientist that have stated to cure what ever illness on mice that doesn't work on humans. If we could translate mice to humans studies 1:1 then we wouldn't have such a big need for human trails.
Example why mice studies doesn't give any correlation to human studies.
Mice Aren’t Men
The finding is stunning because mice have long been considered a model organism for researching drugs for use in people. The study authors estimate that 150 potential treatments for severe inflammation have been tested in people after being found to work in mice—and in the human trials, not a single one worked.
In fact, the researchers found only a very weak correlation between mouse and human genes activated in the body’s response to a burn injury. For response to blunt trauma, the correlation was weaker still; for response to bacterial toxin that mimics infection, nearly nonexistent. In some cases, the researchers found that the same genes were activated in humans and mice, but in opposite directions—meaning that a drug that worked well in a mouse might actually harm a human patient. This helps to explain why it’s been so difficult to find drugs that effectively treat inflammation.
What are you even doing here in this part of the forum? You state all sorts of things but can't back it up with any study.
I don't even know why I bother with this forum these days. The quality of people like you on this forum is just right down the drain, do you even have an education and know how to support your claims?!
You haven't provide one link yet, i'm the only one that have done so.
Only thing you have done is come up with uneducated statements. But that is what can be expected with people like you, trying to do name calling because of a obvious learning disability and not being able to find information to back up your own statement, that is why this forum is hurting when there are people like you stating things they have no clue about.
But hair loss is cured then, because no mice suffer from baldness with all the cures they have been exposed to. Because according to you if it works in mice in works in humans too !
You are the one who started the name-calling. I never call people names nor insult their intelligence until they do it to me. Go ahead and twist my words all you want, I'm done responding to you unless you want to meet in real life. I know you wouldn't talk to me like this in real life though. You know in my very first post about this I said that this is different than drugs. We all know the mice model is far from perfect when it comes to drugs. This is not a drug, and time will prove you wrong. I won't see you in Japan though because I'm sure you won't be able to afford the treatment if you're so insecure you have to call people uneducated because you don't agree with them, and they won't jump through hoops for you.
You don't even know how i look like, where i live or what i even do for a living, and yet again you have so many statements about everything, but what are you backing it up with? Exactly nothing.
But sure i can meet you in real life and talk to you the same way, what are you going to do about it? act all tough and think you are somebody?
You can't even be somebody on this forum and backup your statements, how bad aren't you going to perform in real life. But a tell for uneducated people is that they think science is personal thoughts and statements. But that is not how it works. Science is about backing it up with own or other peoples experiments and/or studies. You have done so ONCE. So it speaks in volumes you aren't an academic.
Thinking its about jumping through hoops when people ask you to prove what you are stating just tells so much. If you were so sure about what you said it wouldn't take you 2 seconds to give a link to a study or so. But it still haven't happened.
So i'm asking again, what are you even doing here?! you are clearly over your head in this.
Where'd you get your MD/Ph.D?
And yet you'd take my bet, "in a second."
Nihongo ga wakarimasu? Watashi wa wakarimasu. You have a lot to learn about the veracity and innovation of the Japanese medical industry.
Why? The more pages, the more wages.
- Reaction score
- 2,564
f*** f*** f***. This thread has turned into pure cringe. Scientists must find a cure to baldness asap if only to prevent a shitshow like this.
- Reaction score
- 131
You know this thread is an absolute embarrassment when Peterson is one of the few voices of reason in here
Unbanned and back at it - how many posts will you make on your lonely New Year's night, I wonder.
Don't include me in that group - I never believed in that Turkish snake oil.
- Reaction score
- 521
Do you think there will be an update from Dr Tsuji anytime soon?
H
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 775
I thought there was supposed to be some announcement coming from the Organ Tech team toward the end of 2019?
- Reaction score
- 481
- Reaction score
- 13
The Western world is an illusion of monogamy. In reality the vast majority of women are not attracted to their husbands and are only with them due to security and tradition. University is a classic example of just how polygamous humans really are, and this doesn't go with age, it only hides itself due to a change in circumstances. It literally would not make sense if humans were naturally monogamous and for hypergamy to not exist.
Please enlighten us on the recent Tsuji news. Then people will get back on topic.
- Reaction score
- 13
If by "anytime soon" you mean a month or so... I highly doubt it. Within 6 months to a year? I would say so.
The longer we go without news, the worse the outcome will be.
- Reaction score
- 521
The worse my mental health would be too.
You obviously don't know the meaning of polygamy. It doesn't mean sleeping around or being attracted to other people, it means having multiple spouses. The top 20% of men don't all have five wives while the 80% at the bottom are all alone. The point is that he can find someone to have a relationship with and marry. She may not be physically attracted to him, and there's not guarantee she won't cheat on him with someone more attractive, but he can find someone. Just because a girl wants to be with the top 20% of men doesn't mean one of those men will marry her. Most likely they won't.