Ucla Scientists Identify A New Way To Activate Stem Cells To Make Hair Grow

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
hair+follicle+image+for+press+release_mid.jpg

Untreated mouse skin showing no hair growth, left, compared to mouse skin treated with the drug UK5099 showing hair growth.

Article:
UCLA researchers have discovered a new way to activate the stem cells in the hair follicle to make hair grow. The research, led by scientists Heather Christofk and William Lowry, may lead to new drugs that could promote hair growth for people with baldness or alopecia, which is hair loss associated with such factors as hormonal imbalance, stress, aging or chemotherapy treatment.

The research was published in the journal Nature Cell Biology.

Hair follicle stem cells are long-lived cells in the hair follicle; they are present in the skin and produce hair throughout a person’s lifetime. They are “quiescent,” meaning they are normally inactive, but they quickly activate during a new hair cycle, which is when new hair growth occurs. The quiescence of hair follicle stem cells is regulated by many factors. In certain cases they fail to activate, which is what causes hair loss.

In this study, Christofk and Lowry, of Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCLA, found that hair follicle stem cell metabolism is different from other cells of the skin. Cellular metabolism involves the breakdown of the nutrients needed for cells to divide, make energy and respond to their environment. The process of metabolism uses enzymes that alter these nutrients to produce “metabolites.” As hair follicle stem cells consume the nutrient glucose — a form of sugar — from the bloodstream, they process the glucose to eventually produce a metabolite called pyruvate. The cells then can either send pyruvate to their mitochondria — the part of the cell that creates energy — or can convert pyruvate into another metabolite called lactate.

“Our observations about hair follicle stem cell metabolism prompted us to examine whether genetically diminishing the entry of pyruvate into the mitochondria would force hair follicle stem cells to make more lactate, and if that would activate the cells and grow hair more quickly,” said Christofk, an associate professor of biological chemistry and molecular and medical pharmacology.

The research team first blocked the production of lactate genetically in mice and showed that this prevented hair follicle stem cell activation. Conversely, in collaboration with the Rutter lab at University of Utah, they increased lactate production genetically in the mice and this accelerated hair follicle stem cell activation, increasing the hair cycle.

“Before this, no one knew that increasing or decreasing the lactate would have an effect on hair follicle stem cells,” said Lowry, a professor of molecular, cell and developmental biology. “Once we saw how altering lactate production in the mice influenced hair growth, it led us to look for potential drugs that could be applied to the skin and have the same effect.”

The team identified two drugs that, when applied to the skin of mice, influenced hair follicle stem cells in distinct ways to promote lactate production. The first drug, called RCGD423, activates a cellular signaling pathway called JAK-Stat, which transmits information from outside the cell to the nucleus of the cell. The research showed that JAK-Stat activation leads to the increased production of lactate and this in turn drives hair follicle stem cell activation and quicker hair growth. The other drug, called UK5099, blocks pyruvate from entering the mitochondria, which forces the production of lactate in the hair follicle stem cells and accelerates hair growth in mice.

“Through this study, we gained a lot of interesting insight into new ways to activate stem cells,” said Aimee Flores, a predoctoral trainee in Lowry’s lab and first author of the study. “The idea of using drugs to stimulate hair growth through hair follicle stem cells is very promising given how many millions of people, both men and women, deal with hair loss. I think we’ve only just begun to understand the critical role metabolism plays in hair growth and stem cells in general; I’m looking forward to the potential application of these new findings for hair loss and beyond.”

The use of RCGD423 to promote hair growth is covered by a provisional patent application filed by the UCLA Technology Development Group on behalf of UC Regents. The use of UK5099 to promote hair growth is covered by a separate provisional patent filed by the UCLA Technology Development Group on behalf of UC Regents, with Lowry and Christofk as inventors.

The experimental drugs described above were used in preclinical tests only and have not been tested in humans or approved by the Food and Drug Administration as safe and effective for use in humans.

The research was supported by a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine training grant, a New Idea Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, the National Cancer Institute (R25T CA098010), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM081686 and R01-GM0866465), the National Institutes of Health (RO1GM094232), an American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant (RSG-16-111-01-MPC), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (5R01AR57409), a Rose Hills Foundation Research Award and the Gaba Fund. The Rose Hills award and the Gaba Fund are administered through the UCLA Broad Stem Cell Research Center.

Further research on the use of UK5099 is being funded by the UCLA Technology Development Group through funds from California State Assembly Bill 2664.

Source:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/u...-way-to-activate-stem-cells-to-make-hair-grow
 

Dat5Years

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
479
You can buy it, and I'm tempted to. But I have no idea of the human conversion
 

Christian Miller

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
223
You could use my piss and that would regrow hair on a mouse

This could lead to an alternative to finasteride tho, will take years tho probably.
Stop with this nuance about everything working on mice.
It is NOT true, amigo.
Actually, it's quite the opposite. Most experiments fail on mice.
 

MrV88

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,242
We have so many crazy idiots around here, why don't we test it on them instead of mice? Would be much faster and help us more than the whole mice sh*t

PS: yeah I know law bla bla go to North Korea and test it there
 

The Baldy Man

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
255
Not really impressed by these studies anymore since they have been coming out for decades and we are still no closer to a cure. Ah if only I could have been born a mouse, I would totally be pulling tons of mouse chicks with my lab grown negative Norwood. Sadly I am a poor balding man and I think I will just invest my hopes and dreams on the companies actually working towards something like Follica and Tsuji.
 

SamFT

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
432
Man one thing I don't understand about trials and experiments. Why do they always use animals? Like for every kind of treatment out there that's in the works you bet you could find a solid amount of humans to be the first ones to try it. Not everything that works for mice works for humans lol I hope someone tries to pass a bill where humans can be the first ones tested on it would be quicker as well. Cause if this guy from UCLA could've worked on humans first and not fucken animals we would all be a bit fucken excited
 

d3nt3dsh0v3l

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,709
Man one thing I don't understand about trials and experiments. Why do they always use animals? Like for every kind of treatment out there that's in the works you bet you could find a solid amount of humans to be the first ones to try it. Not everything that works for mice works for humans lol I hope someone tries to pass a bill where humans can be the first ones tested on it would be quicker as well. Cause if this guy from UCLA could've worked on humans first and not fucken animals we would all be a bit fucken excited

That doesn't make sense. Because people want to try lots of different things all the time, most of which wont work. You aren't taking into consideration all the mice that didn't make it onto the paper. It's a lot easier to get that many mice than humans.

And secondly bro are you reading the papers? Half the mice are genetically engineered to silence some gene expression or enhance other gene expression. You need this for establishing control groups to show that what you think is happening, really is happening. It's a lot easier and more ethical to get genetically engineered mice than humans.

And lastly, the mice are euthanized so we can cut them open and look inside to see what happened.

I understand your frustration but what you are suggesting isn't reasonble. It will always be animals first.
 

Tano1

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
181
Man one thing I don't understand about trials and experiments. Why do they always use animals? Like for every kind of treatment out there that's in the works you bet you could find a solid amount of humans to be the first ones to try it. Not everything that works for mice works for humans lol I hope someone tries to pass a bill where humans can be the first ones tested on it would be quicker as well. Cause if this guy from UCLA could've worked on humans first and not fucken animals we would all be a bit fucken excited


3D Bioprinted tissue derived from our own cells can possibly replace animal testing at some point later on. Skin might be the first of these tissues and they may be able to soon use it to test stuff for skin cosmetics/conditions/cancer etc...
 

d3nt3dsh0v3l

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,709
3D Bioprinted tissue derived from our own cells can possibly replace animal testing at some point later on. Skin might be the first of these tissues and they may be able to soon use it to test stuff for skin cosmetics/conditions/cancer etc...
That's actually not the problem. This is the difference between "in vitro," i.e. in glass, in a test tube, in an isolated culture of sorts, versus "in vivo," i.e. in real life, in a living breathing creature with circulating blood, hormones, growth factors - the whole shebang. We already do advanced in vitro testing, but it turns out that it doesn't always carry over to in vivo. Obviously the latter is what matters the most, but the former is easier to do, so people start with in vitro testing and if possible, move to in vivo, usually beginning with animals.
 

LeanMeanMachine

New Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2
Posted this in other thread:

Just got an email from one of the authors:

"Thanks for your interest in our work. We are working hard to try to bring this technology to the clinic. Keep in mind, however, that this process will take time, and we do not know at this point if our work in mice will translate well to human. If we do get to the clinical trial stage, we will keep your contact info, and let you know."

You guys have anything you want me to ask?
 

Trichosan

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,321
Posted this in other thread:

Just got an email from one of the authors:

"Thanks for your interest in our work. We are working hard to try to bring this technology to the clinic. Keep in mind, however, that this process will take time, and we do not know at this point if our work in mice will translate well to human. If we do get to the clinical trial stage, we will keep your contact info, and let you know."

You guys have anything you want me to ask?

Not really, because you just got all the answers you are going to get.
 

Tano1

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
181
That's actually not the problem. This is the difference between "in vitro," i.e. in glass, in a test tube, in an isolated culture of sorts, versus "in vivo," i.e. in real life, in a living breathing creature with circulating blood, hormones, growth factors - the whole shebang. We already do advanced in vitro testing, but it turns out that it doesn't always carry over to in vivo. Obviously the latter is what matters the most, but the former is easier to do, so people start with in vitro testing and if possible, move to in vivo, usually beginning with animals.

Well the best way to do it is in vivo in humans which will never happen unless they allow crazy people to risk their lives. If you can BioEngineer tissue to function and mimic the original tissue like an exact replica especially by using the original tissue's own cells, then maybe that can at least become a more accurate source for developing and testing breakthroughs, new methods, etc...

I read skin is the tissue being close to reaching that point and they talk about hair follicles as well since several studies show they correlate. Follica, Tsuji and PolarityTE to name a few. Organovo and L'Oreal also partnered to create Bioprinted hair. So even tissue can't be healed, then maybe it can be replaced or made de novo to be transplanted. Probably no risk of rejection either since your own cells were used. So although it's in vitro, at least they're using autologous cells which will be more closely related to a human (specific person even) than say a mouse. I think they could get somewhere with this after some more research is done. I do understand your point of view though and that's the more reason to try and move into something other than animal testing because they're built differently and function differently.
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
i'm confused too why hellouser is posting the same thing again.

4am, dead tired... found it via reddit, hit the sack shortly after. I jumped the gun. Sorry guys.
 

Xander94

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,602
4am, dead tired... found it via reddit, hit the sack shortly after. I jumped the gun. Sorry guys.
Lmao mate after all this years I dont understand how are u not depressed with the current progress...
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
Lmao mate after all this years I dont understand how are u not depressed with the current progress...

Oh... I am. I just keep it at bay.
 
Top