The science behind topical DHT inhibitors?

bodysnatcher

Established Member
Reaction score
3
I thought Propecia and other oral finasterides worked by entering your bloodstream.

How do these topical DHT inhibitors work?

Have any studies been done?

If so then why are they not regaurded as highly as the big 3?

Which are the best ones?

Do they bring a shed? even if you are also on finasteride?

Any known side effects? are they similar to the oral DHT inhibitors?

Level with me, are they worth it?

Thanks
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
43
bodysnatcher said:
I thought Propecia and other oral finasterides worked by entering your bloodstream.

They do.

bodysnatcher said:
How do these topical DHT inhibitors work?

By inhibiting the conversion of testosterone into DHT within hair follicle cells.

bodysnatcher said:
Have any studies been done?

Yes. A few.

bodysnatcher said:
If so then why are they not regaurded as highly as the big 3?

It's difficult to find good drugs (and good topical vehicles to deliver them) which penetrate well into the skin/scalp, without having a significant systemic effect.

bodysnatcher said:
Which are the best ones?

Good question, and highly controversial. In my own opinion, topical fatty acids may be the best all-around choice.

bodysnatcher said:
Any known side effects? are they similar to the oral DHT inhibitors?

Should be similar.

bodysnatcher said:
Level with me, are they worth it?

Another highly controversial question! :)

Bryan
 

iamnaked

Experienced Member
Reaction score
3
Bryan said:
Good question, and highly controversial. In my own opinion, topical fatty acids may be the best all-around choice.

Holy liposomic inhibition, Batman! What might be an example of a topical fatty acid DHT blocker?
 

science-jay

Established Member
Reaction score
0
JWM said:
Revivogen is the only one I know of.

the only problem is:

1. it's extremely smelly and greasy.
2. there are not many users who have had succes with it.
3. because they've put al active ingredients they thought of in 1 bottle they can rule each other out.
4. some suspicious people are working for the revivogen company

super-zix and spironolactone first!
 

Lessofarockstar

Established Member
Reaction score
1
Bryan, why is p-r-ocerin then considered a scam. With the following ingredients in it, shouldnt it be considered a very effective topical?
I have no experience with it, but it seems to be considered useless here on HairLossTalk.com.

Ingredients:
SD alcohol 40, Oleic Acid, Linoleic Acid, Alpha Linoleic Acid, Azelaic Acid, Primrose Oil, Avacado Oil , Saw Palmetto Extract, Grape Seed Extract, Gamma Linoleric Acid, Pygeum Bark Extract, Stinging Nettle Leaf Extract, Toocopheral, Zinc Sulphate, Pyridoxine.


Does anybody know exactly why it gets starred out when you write it? Has it been proved to be a scam? It seems somewhat similar to revivogen...
 

science-jay

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Lessofarockstar said:
Bryan, why is p-r-ocerin then considered a scam. With the following ingredients in it, shouldnt it be considered a very effective topical?
I have no experience with it, but it seems to be considered useless here on HairLossTalk.com.

Ingredients:
SD alcohol 40, Oleic Acid, Linoleic Acid, Alpha Linoleic Acid, Azelaic Acid, Primrose Oil, Avacado Oil , Saw Palmetto Extract, Grape Seed Extract, Gamma Linoleric Acid, Pygeum Bark Extract, Stinging Nettle Leaf Extract, Toocopheral, Zinc Sulphate, Pyridoxine.


Does anybody know exactly why it gets starred out when you write it? Has it been proved to be a scam? It seems somewhat similar to revivogen...


on Hairlosstalk.com there is a tendency to put down non-proven treatments...

there is nothing wrong with that, proven things first, i agree.

the only strange thing is that REVIVOGEN is so positively evaluated on this site bij the HairLossTalk.com-moderater and Bryan. I think it has something to do with selling the stuff on this site, HairLossTalk.com has to make a living too ofcourse...
 
G

Guest

Guest
YEAH.. Its sad that they don´t admit it.. but I can understand it tough :lol: Money talks and hairlocks falls!!

I would consider Dutas as the best topical DHT inhibitor!! Thats what am gonna try.. dutasteride + Aloe.. The Double A..

Unless someone can prove it is not the best??
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
43
Lessofarockstar said:
Bryan, why is p-r-ocerin then considered a scam. With the following ingredients in it, shouldnt it be considered a very effective topical?
I have no experience with it, but it seems to be considered useless here on HairLossTalk.com.

Ingredients:
SD alcohol 40, Oleic Acid, Linoleic Acid, Alpha Linoleic Acid, Azelaic Acid, Primrose Oil, Avacado Oil , Saw Palmetto Extract, Grape Seed Extract, Gamma Linoleric Acid, Pygeum Bark Extract, Stinging Nettle Leaf Extract, Toocopheral, Zinc Sulphate, Pyridoxine.

I'm not familiar enough with the product to have much of an opinion. I haven't bothered to read any of the threads about it.

It does appear to be similar to Revivogen, but I can't help but wonder just how deep the similarity goes. Does it contain as much of the active ingredients as Revivogen? Are the fatty acids and the other things in the proper form to be effective? I have no idea...

Lessofarockstar said:
Does anybody know exactly why it gets starred out when you write it? Has it been proved to be a scam?

There's probably some bad blood between the HairLossTalk.com admin and the makers of that product. I don't know any details of that.

Bryan
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
43
science-jay said:
the only strange thing is that REVIVOGEN is so positively evaluated on this site bij the HairLossTalk.com-moderater and Bryan. I think it has something to do with selling the stuff on this site, HairLossTalk.com has to make a living too ofcourse...

I can't speak for HairLossTalk.com's motivations, of course, but I think I made it clear in my article "Random Reflections on Revivogen" that it was based mainly on theoretical considerations and some animal experiments. Like everyone else, I wish to god that we could FINALLY have some independent testing of that product, so that we could once and for all put an end to all the controversy around it.

Bryan
 

science-jay

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Bryan said:
science-jay said:
the only strange thing is that REVIVOGEN is so positively evaluated on this site bij the HairLossTalk.com-moderater and Bryan. I think it has something to do with selling the stuff on this site, HairLossTalk.com has to make a living too ofcourse...

I can't speak for HairLossTalk.com's motivations, of course, but I think I made it clear in my article "Random Reflections on Revivogen" that it was based mainly on theoretical considerations and some animal experiments. Like everyone else, I wish to god that we could FINALLY have some independent testing of that product, so that we could once and for all put an end to all the controversy around it.

Bryan

i agree testing is the only thing that will stop controversy...
until then i'm going to stick with either proven or cheap & unproven
 
Top