LastSamurai
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 233
I was just curious to start a thread on weight lifting and how it applies to us guys.
Now this is the place I am coming from.
Hair is desired by women.
But separately muscles are desired by women. That is a scientific fact.
My theory:
- No muscles and no hair = low attractiveness (for arguments sake)
- No muscles and hair = medium attractiveness
- Muscles and hair = high attractiveness (chad level)
- Muscles and no hair = medium attractiveness (and could be more attractive then no muscles and hair variant.
I know above is very much a rough working template, but you can see the point I'm trying to make. I'm curious as a group on here, are we working out? Are we trying improve ourselves in that respect?
Muscles are impressive, they add frame, they add aura and confidence. They are a strong symbol to a women of a provider/protector from an evolutionary perspective. And they turn women on. So scientifically speaking, having good muscles could bypass no hair. Because you have something that is providing an alternative type of attraction to women.
Everyday, I walk down the street in London, and if I was to make a very rough estimate, I would say most older guys are overweight and have zero dress sense. In terms of younger guys 20-40 lets say, the dress sense is better, but again, I would say only 10% have a good body and noticeable muscles. As popular as working out is, it is still a commodity that not everyone attains.
I'm gettng nearer to 30, and I'm looking for options. I've always been quite slim, and played sports. But I've never properly hit the weights. Looking into the next 10 years, I'm thinking, it's time. Building proper muscle is a long term asset. It really is. It's something that takes sometime to build but is absolutely worth while, and rewarding as well. Strong muscles are the only true compromise of hairloss. Dressing well is also up there.
The 10% of the most attractive guys of any age group are well dressed and well-built. I'm not saying hairloss doesn't f*** us, it does f*** us. But scientifically speaking, if we had great bodies, we're improving our general health, self-image/confidence, and indirectly or perhaps even directly, our success with women.
Fundementally I see it as something that we can be proud of. Hairloss takes our pride, and at least muscles give us something back, a sense of self worth and self-image that we lost when hairloss ravaged us.
Now this is the place I am coming from.
Hair is desired by women.
But separately muscles are desired by women. That is a scientific fact.
My theory:
- No muscles and no hair = low attractiveness (for arguments sake)
- No muscles and hair = medium attractiveness
- Muscles and hair = high attractiveness (chad level)
- Muscles and no hair = medium attractiveness (and could be more attractive then no muscles and hair variant.
I know above is very much a rough working template, but you can see the point I'm trying to make. I'm curious as a group on here, are we working out? Are we trying improve ourselves in that respect?
Muscles are impressive, they add frame, they add aura and confidence. They are a strong symbol to a women of a provider/protector from an evolutionary perspective. And they turn women on. So scientifically speaking, having good muscles could bypass no hair. Because you have something that is providing an alternative type of attraction to women.
Everyday, I walk down the street in London, and if I was to make a very rough estimate, I would say most older guys are overweight and have zero dress sense. In terms of younger guys 20-40 lets say, the dress sense is better, but again, I would say only 10% have a good body and noticeable muscles. As popular as working out is, it is still a commodity that not everyone attains.
I'm gettng nearer to 30, and I'm looking for options. I've always been quite slim, and played sports. But I've never properly hit the weights. Looking into the next 10 years, I'm thinking, it's time. Building proper muscle is a long term asset. It really is. It's something that takes sometime to build but is absolutely worth while, and rewarding as well. Strong muscles are the only true compromise of hairloss. Dressing well is also up there.
The 10% of the most attractive guys of any age group are well dressed and well-built. I'm not saying hairloss doesn't f*** us, it does f*** us. But scientifically speaking, if we had great bodies, we're improving our general health, self-image/confidence, and indirectly or perhaps even directly, our success with women.
Fundementally I see it as something that we can be proud of. Hairloss takes our pride, and at least muscles give us something back, a sense of self worth and self-image that we lost when hairloss ravaged us.
Last edited: