Replicel Is On Fire Lately — Data In Feb.

[Netsky]

So, it's the last day of Feb tomorrow ? Where's the brotzu style hype?

 

[Drogedagh]

So, it's the last day of Feb tomorrow ? Where's the brotzu style hype?

No, thank you. It was Asylum-style hype.

 

[shookones]

And?

?

 

[DrizzyD]

Where tf is the data replicel

 

[nameless]

so nameless, do you think this inductivity problem will be solved soon considering the research paper that I have posted?
because as far as I know if this is solved, it will end our misery right now

The inductivity problem may actually be completely solved by Dr. Terskikh iPS cells. The below excerpt from a question answer session with Dr. Terskikh that was just posted at this site.


HLC2020: Do the DPs that you have created show similar gene expression to ordinary, healthy DPs? Do they maintain the gene expression when multiplied by 3 orders of magnitude (I think that means 3 hair follicle cycles)?

Dr. Terskikh: Currently there are no methods to amplify DP cells in the dish. They loose the hair induction properties after couple of passages. This is precisely the problem. That’s why we don’t amplify DP cells in the dish. We amplify iPSCs cells, which could grow in the dish almost indefinitely. Then the “buckets” of iPSCs cells are converted to the “buckets” of DP cells that are needed for transplantation.

 

[Rofler]

The inductivity problem is actually completely solved. It's the iPS cell work being done by Dr. Terskikh. His method completely solves the inductivity problem. The below excerpt from a question answer session with Dr. Terskikh that was just posted at this site.


HLC2020: Do the DPs that you have created show similar gene expression to ordinary, healthy DPs? Do they maintain the gene expression when multiplied by 3 orders of magnitude (I think that means 3 hair follicle cycles)?

Dr. Terskikh: Currently there are no methods to amplify DP cells in the dish. They loose the hair induction properties after couple of passages. This is precisely the problem. That’s why we don’t amplify DP cells in the dish. We amplify iPSCs cells, which could grow in the dish almost indefinitely. Then the “buckets” of iPSCs cells are converted to the “buckets” of DP cells that are needed for transplantation.

What about statements that this approach can cause cancer?

 

[nameless]

What about statements that this approach can cause cancer?

Are those concerns overblown? I don't know. You tell me.

https://www.regmednet.com/users/103...m-cell-reprogramming-unlikely-to-cause-cancer

http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/stem..._induced_pluripotent_stem_cells_safe_yet.html

http://hsci.harvard.edu/bringing-ips-cells-closer-clinic

http://en.snu.ac.kr/research/highlights?bbsidx=121988

 

[DrizzyD]

Lmfao still no news, this is a sick tease.

 

[Captain Rex]

Lmfao still no news, this is a sick tease.

third party issue

 

[GotHair?]

I respect this. The data is being evaluated by a third party. Guess we have to wait...
I'm rooting for them but as I said if they at least stop the hair loss in 5 years it is still a substantial win...

 

[nameless]

I respect this. The data is being evaluated by a third party. Guess we have to wait...
I'm rooting for them but as I said if they at least stop the hair loss in 5 years it is still a substantial win...

Replicel says they (Replicel) haven't leaked information but Replicel wouldn't know if the 3rd party that's evaluating the data has leaked info.

 

[Moran XING]

Maybe there's a leak of information by the 3rd party evaluating the data. That could explain the recent stock price drop. Replicel says they (Replicel) haven't leaked information but Replicel wouldn't know if the 3rd party that's evaluating the data has leaked info.

Its hard to say the 3rd party evaluating the data in the past few days since they usually make the stock price drop by man-made before going up for some new inversters. We are looking forward the coming up data in hungry. Here comes one question from my side. Is there anyone know the soures from Replicel or Shishido？？？

 

[hanginginthewire]

Maybe there's a leak of information by the 3rd party evaluating the data. That could explain the recent stock price drop. Replicel says they (Replicel) haven't leaked information but Replicel wouldn't know if the 3rd party that's evaluating the data has leaked info.

Why would a 3rd party do that? Don't be so negative you are killing the few strands of hope I have left!

 

[nameless]

Why would a 3rd party do that? Don't be so negative you are killing the few strands of hope I have left!

What do you mean "Why would the 3rd party do that?"

Why wouldn't they do that?

And even if Replicel fails there is still room for hope.

 

[rclark]

What do you mean why would the 3rd party do that?

Why wouldn't they do that?

And even if Replicel fails there is still room for hope.

There really isn't any hope. At least for us in Generation X.

Our hope is gone, with our youth ship.

By the time a medication comes out that actually "reverses" vellus, long dead follicles, it won't
do either of us any good.

 

[nameless]

Because they would be sued into oblivion and never work in the field again. Also, it would be an SEC violation, so they would then go to jail.

Nothing's leaked.

And if these potential consequences (litigation, jail, blackballed from working in the industry) would stop everyone from leaking then there would be no such thing as leaks but of course leaks happen anyway.

It's real simple Occulus, some people at the 3rd party company thought Replicel sounded like a nifty idea so they got friends/family to buy lots of stock. Later those people at the 3rd party company see the negative results and warn their family/friends, who sell-off the stock. The stock price comes down.

 

[hanginginthewire]

There really isn't any hope. At least for us in Generation X.

Our hope is gone, with our youth ship.

By the time a medication comes out that actually "reverses" vellus, long dead follicles, it won't
do either of us any good.

I feel so much better.

 

[nameless]

So if it rarely happens then it definitely happened?

Take your mess dude, seriously - have you thought about counseling?

You need to grow a brain, moron. I never said it happens "rarely".

Like I said, lots of stock-holders must be calling Replicel with concerns about leaks or else Replicel wouldn't have tweeted that Replicel hasn't done any leaking. It looks like lots of people are seeing the same thing I'm seeing. LMAO! You need to go back to school.

 

[nameless]

So "lots" of uninformed people speculating on the internet called Replicel, so that means there's a leak?

Whenever I engage you, I always come away feeling bad, because it's very obvious to me that I'm dealing with someone who is not only emotionally unbalanced, but who also never received a remedial education in basic logic fallacies.

So let's break down your argument, shall we?

Leaks happen. "Lots of people" (how many? You must know, since you know it's "lots") of people have asked Replicel why their stock price fell. Ergo, some one leaked data, and its negative.

Log off for a while, huh? See what the world's like when you're not obsessing on this site? You will feel better, I promise.

I didn't even bother reading your stupid sh*t and I won't read anything else you post. I have no time for your stupidity. So long dumb-***.

 

[paxis]

I dont get how unreliable the hairloss business is.. Every f*****g time its not as expected and told.. Just pathetic and annoying. I can already see kelopesia release date also being shifted as well AGAIN..