- Reaction score
- 200
You are just seeing your side of the story..
Think about it: a product that halts (immunizes, even if for 5 or 10 yrs) hair loss.
Now, you are 17.. Baldness runs into your family.. Ok, no problem.. Gonna get an immunization shot, and I'm good.
There will be an infinite line of ppl going for it.
And an infinite line of bald people who would scoff at it because it does nothing for them.
NW0-1's would be happy with this yes, and NW2-3's that are planning on getting FUE's but first want to stabilize would be happy too. But that doesn't help people who are already bald NW4+, or diffused thinners.
It's funny because minoxidil stabilized my hair loss before I even got on finasteride, it just doesn't regrow hair, it doesn't work to get my hairline back. So there's already a drug for me that stopped my hair loss, and not only me, but many others, millions of others. So seeing people saying they'd be happy with a drug that stops hair loss has me tearing out my hair (and you know I can't afford to do that), because that's ALL minoxidil and finasteride do, but I understand why some people ignore finasteride, because of it's sides. But still minoxidil did that for me. So that's why i'm against the mentality of being content with a drug that stops hair loss, that already exists, that's ALL that exists, I have the mentality of regrowing hair. That does not exist yet, not on a wide scale. On some users yes, but not all users, which is what I want. A treatment that stops hair loss and regrows hair on 99.9% of users.