First of all, this got way more heated than I intended, and I'm not about to get involved in any drama. I'm just trying to have a civil debate here.
I honestly don't really give two shits about a tiny punch if it gives me a thick head of hair with an excellent looking hairline.... Follica cannot do that. It cannot provide great terminal density and it cannot create a hairline. Period.
I'm going to have to disagree. And we may have to agree to disagree on this point because it's a dead end argument. But I'll say my peace: I mean 10,000 is still a decent number of people and yes, I do think if you call at the very earliest possible time, then you have pretty damn good odds of getting your foot in the door. At the very least, this contradicts your point of "almost no one being able to afford it". If barely anyone can afford it, then there won't be much demand at all, so I shouldn't have to worry about slots filling up...right? Pick one.
If we're getting into a debate over semantics, then this may be a dead end argument as well. But again I'll say my peace: A cure for me (and probably for most people) is one that could effectively give a bald man a full dense head of hair with a good looking hairline. Follica cannot do this. Tsuji's method can. If that is really your definition of a cure, then you would consider the big 3 to be a cure just because it can all but halt hairloss and even provide improvement? I am not buying that at all, and I think most people would agree.
According to '
http://www.keratin.com/aa/aa014.shtml' a normal density is between 200-300 follicles per cm2. Follica will provide not 100...but 25 terminal follicles per cm2 and 75 vellus follicles per cm2. These vellus hair fibers will be thin and wispy so no, I'm not buying this density argument at all.
I am not only focused on Tsuji, though I can understand how my posts make it seem that way. I absolutely plan on getting Shiseido's treatment hopefully in 2018 if their 'stop loss' potential really pans out. And please don't get me wrong... I think Follica has great potential as a treatment and an additional weapon in the war against hair loss. I am just trying to argue that I don't believe it's comparable to Tsuji.. I am certainly not pissing away my youth. I'm a NW1+ and honestly my hairloss isn't even noticeable to people except for myself. I'm having a f*****g ball in life tbh. However, I am trying to plan for the future and for me, Tsuji is the future (and I'm also very hopeful for Shiseido).
I think this comment about the riskiness of the 3 companies is just ridiculous speculation. It does not hold any real basis at all. If we're resorting to arguments like this then yes, we should also truly be concerned with North Korea's missiles flying over Japan... It's a risk right?
There are what ifs for Follica and for any other company as well... You never truly know until it's
out.