When you start to go bald young, it usually means that it's aggressive, but not always. A friend of mine is balding since he was 17 for example, but he didn't get worse than a Norwood 2 for more than 5 years. He's the only one, though; the majority of people I know who were balding before their 20s developed a full horse-shoe before their 30s. Same for me, I started to go bald 4 years ago and I'm Norwood 4 even though I've been using finasteride and minoxidil for years.
I would think the younger you start it would indicate aggressive hair loss, but like dante said not always. I do think hair follicles that are sensitive to dht have a predisposed timeline as to which they will begin to "Die". My hair loss started at 32, i got on finasteride at 34 i believe had i not by 36 to 38 id prob have noticeable hair loss. So i guess we'd probably all just be speculating an answer to this question... Im curious now. Im gonna try and find the true answer
I better pray for new treatments then
I'm afraid no valid new treatment is going to come out. Not soon, at least.
i truly hope so, for everyone's sake. Hair loss just makes you feel awful about yourself and i think it actually can cause physical health problems, because the toll of stress, anxiety, and depression. All three are overlooked alot as causes to a myriad of health problemsI disagree. Histogen/replicel/SM/follica/Brotzu/Other Japanese guy there's too many to fail. Could be wrong but I think histogen will be the first one out
I started loosing my hair on the sides (see picture) when i was 18 and it got like that fast.
But i haven't experienced much hair loss after that and im 29 soon to be 30. a little thinner on the crown and maybe a little thinner overall but nothing that shows. Picture nr 2 are from one week ago so more than 10 years sense my aggressive hair loss started. (I got a hair transplant when i was 24)
So it goes to show that there is a difference! I mean OBVIOUSLY the sooner you start balding the sooner you will be bald. I have lost 2 Norwoods in 4 years. For me to go fully bald it would take 12 years to get to a Norwood 6. 12 years isn't agreessive, but since I began at 16 that makes me bald at 28. So I think there is a difference between aggression of hairloss and pre mature hair loss
Now contrast that to one of his best friends, all the way up until age 45 we are talking deadset norwood 0. Razer sharp hairline lower than novak djockovichs, bang suddenly goes full norwood 5-6 territory in a little under 3 years.
I started loosing my hair on the sides (see picture) when i was 18 and it got like that fast.
But i haven't experienced much hair loss after that and im 29 soon to be 30. a little thinner on the crown and maybe a little thinner overall but nothing that shows. Picture nr 2 are from one week ago so more than 10 years sense my aggressive hair loss started. (I got a hair transplant when i was 24)
Your hair looks great Mattias, may I ask who did your transplant?
hopefully there will be new research about this in the coming years to explain why blading apears at different ages to different peopleThere should be research about this. Very interesting that people can hold on to Norwood-2's till 45 then just suddenly lose it all. It can't just be DHT sensitivity in the follicles, gotta be something else that's going on.
