kingdomforhair
Member
- Reaction score
- 19
I agree with Fred. Those of you disagreeing do indeed make the valid point that aesthetically, baldness is a negative; what you are missing is that it is not that big of an aesthetic negative. In addition, there are other much larger factors at play which determine whether a man is "attractive" to women or not. Remember, women are not like men. Whether a man finds a woman attractive is almost exclusively determined by her appearance, it doesn't matter if she has no friends, or is an introvert, or if she living with her parents, or if she is poor, if she has no career ambitions, and so on. Not so for attractiveness of men to women.
The cherry on top: it is allowed, even expected of leading men, to wear clothes which suit them. But not a wig (which is essentially a kind of clothing).
It depends on the man.
If we're talking about the average man, if he loses his hair then it will be a big drop in his attractiveness. Average men don't have millions of dollars or fancy cars to compensate.
There is a only a small percentage of men who look good bald. IF you're skinny, or pale, or with the wrong skull shape then you'll look very bad bald. While women have more attributes they care about than men they still place a premium on genetic health in their partners.
It's easy to test out, go to a bar dress and act affluent/powerful as a bald man and see how women react. Why worry about these theories where women care little about looks, go out and test your theory in the real world.
I would say allot of what men feel about balding comes from real world experience, no doubt they first try and digest the positive messages people have on balding ("Don't worry women don't care") then the real world kicks in.
If women and society truly aligned with your theory then this forum would not exist, sure there might be a few eccentrics who no matter the evidence available won't listen to reality but mainstream forums like this would have no purpose.
- - - Updated - - -
I think baldness isn't as aesthetically damaging as some would make out but then again its entirely dependent on the person. I'm sure Michael Jordan didnt lose much sleep when he starting going bald, Brendan Fraser on the other hand...
In your example, Michael Jordan is an athlete, his appearance does not matter. But for sure being athletic, tall and black helps if you're bald.
Brendan Fraser is an actor, his career is built largely on his looks. He was always the likable strongman. Not that he's balding it's no longer possible for him to elicit a leading man vibe. His career is essentially over in mainstream, high budget movies. Same for Jude Law.
It's strange these celebrity examples are always used. Why not think about the average man who has no millions, is not a famous athlete and maybe already had marginal confidence in himself?
I typed in "average young man" and this is what I got:
On a slightly above average guy like this would probably just lose a point if he shaved, but he could forget about looking attractive. No hair just makes his face plain as can be.
If you look like this (short, bald, skinny, pale) it's game over, even if you fixed the pale, skinny part. A narrow face is a death sentence.
Being short and having narrow shoulders seals the deal. If you're bald you have to be masculine.
If anyone thinks i'm being shallow go as see for yourself, it's coming up to the weekend, go talk to women instead of seeking false boosts of self esteem from well meaning but deluded strangers on the internet.