Im open to you dissecting my logic and explaining where it logically makes no sense.
A mature hairline is the result of hair miniaturizing, and is not considered balding. A Norwood 7 is the result of hair miniaturizing and therefore is not considered balding either.
Of course it all depends on the definition of balding of course which im sure is less then precise. Then you go oh well look at the norwood scale. Who the hell invented this scale? if 1 hair miniaturizes you have technically lost a hair due to male pattern baldness. The Norwood scale doesnt even account for all hairloss. Diffuse loss isnt even covered in the Norwood scale what a joke that guy was probably drunk when he scribbled it down 200 years ago and here we are blindly following it today.
A mature hairline is the result of hair miniaturizing, and is not considered balding. A Norwood 7 is the result of hair miniaturizing and therefore is not considered balding either.
Of course it all depends on the definition of balding of course which im sure is less then precise. Then you go oh well look at the norwood scale. Who the hell invented this scale? if 1 hair miniaturizes you have technically lost a hair due to male pattern baldness. The Norwood scale doesnt even account for all hairloss. Diffuse loss isnt even covered in the Norwood scale what a joke that guy was probably drunk when he scribbled it down 200 years ago and here we are blindly following it today.
