Marijuana is not harmful to the body? Not what science says. I'm getting tired of this internet hipster hippie leftist propaganda BS about cannabis.
I've been on science and skeptics blogs, and the overall real consensus about weed is that it's harmful and it has no benefits whatsoever. Period.
This is the only benefit, and it's the same one for alcohol: it gets you high. But we didn't need any science to figure that one out.
One more cause for your gyno then: http://www.medicaldaily.com/man-boobs-and-marijuana-thc-proven-cause-moobs-264488
You may have been too quick to blame finasteride.
Marijuana's supposed benefits can be debated but one thing that I believe quite strongly is that it is a hell of a lot less harmful than some of the pharmaceutical pills that are being legally advertised to us via television and radio. I live in the United States (one of only 2 countries where peddling pharmaceutical pills directly to the consumer is actually legal) and it sickens me how we are inundated with sh*t like Stelara, Symbicort, Farxiga, or Lyrica, many of which possess terrible side effects (which can even lead to death) and whose conditions they supposedly treat can easily be treated more effectively through natural means like diet and exercise.
those are some very sweeping assumptions. i just looked up two meta analyses, where they sum up groups of studies.Anti inflammatories alone do not prevent hair hairloss.
Cannabis is probably safer than alcohol, but more dangerous than any other drug. It burns hotter and results in greater risk of cancer. It's also well know to result in mental illness, particularly depression, paranoia and schizophrenia. I can attest to the fact that while sometimes fun and pleasant, it has also made me paranoid on several occasions, and through frequent use, I became duller for a time. Frequent stoners are often dull and don't realise it. Self medicating is rarely smart when it comes to recreational psychoactive drugs.
lmao at you guys ****ting claims out like its a sure thing
"definitely causes mental illness" really wolf pack? i couldnt find ANYTHING conclusive on it being the causal factor, its still up for debate by people much more knowledgeable about this than us . . . .
and lmao "ultimately its no good". so the mountains of evidence showing its benefits for all sorts of diseases and disorders is meaningless? im too lazy to link some but obviously its super easy to find, google takes 2 secs but im on my phone
im disappointed in how much weight u guys put in ur biased anecdotes and opinions. i deal in logic and facts, not emotional beliefs
im biased towards it obviously as well, which is why i dont mention my opinion that its awesome as support for how healthy it is. in my experience it has greatly improved my life
and wolf pack really? i pegged you a rational guy, how does your rationality disappear when it comes to this?
