I think the bigger question is, will Histogen HSC ever be available? Looking at their trial results, it should be useful if it ever gets released.
I am desperate to improve my aesthetics, as many of you know. There are obvious things for me to do, but sometimes I get sidetracked or told to get lost or overanalyzed things, I finally booked an overdue appointment with an orthodontist today, for example, so in 6-12 months I might have properly aligned teeth that are hopefully white as well.
The conservative cost of a hair transplant is about ~US$ 10,000 once one includes plane tickets + hotel. It will probably improve my looks somewhat, what's the financial value of going from NW2.5 to NW1.5 for me? Is it worth the opportunity cost where that money would be spent on other things? Who the f*** knows, I'm not expecting anybody to have an accurate answer.
I know that my own hair would be better than transplanted hair for a variety of reasons. Perhaps Histogen will be available in 1 year in Mexico for only ~US$ 2,000, so with three trips and three sets of hotels, maybe ~ US $4,000. Will it work?
NO IDEA.
All we have from them, as far as I can tell, are some misleading pictures. It might be great to regenerate the hair that's not transplanted, for maintenance in addition to the transplant. It might end up regrowing hair in the transplanted area, causing that hairline to be doubly-hairy and stupid. It might be a cure. It might give me 5% regrowth. NO IDEA.
First you're wrong, but you already know that.
About your second statement, here's my take: why not both?!
You can wait for the new treatments while making the most of what you can control.
Establish a good career, date a lot of women, Build a great body, make the most of it while being balding or bald (I'd still recommend a FUE though).
Why do people like you think of options always being mutually exclusive?
You can wait for the new treatments while making the most of what you can control.
Establish a good career, date a lot of women, Build a great body, make the most of it while being balding or bald (I'd still recommend a FUE though).
Because what a few people (hair transplant surgeons) believe is relevant and valuable data.
You're wrong, and anyone who's taken the time to learn about the current research will tell you so.
You just want everyone to become bald so you can feel better about your own misery.
You last statement doesn't work when you're bald, I've been there.
It works now that I have some hair, if I was still bald, all my accomplishments wouldn't matter as much.
Being proper bald negative halos the f*** out of any quality you might have.
And this is why you're still posting on this forum.
Particularly with hair loss...if you focus on it then it becomes a huge problem...if you improve yourself in other areas and minimise any focus on it then the problems shrinks.
As for me, i popped back out of boredom while sat on a train this morning curious as to what the world of HairLossTalk.com currently looks like... Answer, exactly the same. My life is good and definitely all the better for not thinking regularly about hair loss which is what happens when you spend so much time on a forum about it.
I don't see the time I'm spending on this forum as wasted.
Wasting time for me would be not doing certain things because I would think that my hair state doesn't allow it.
Moments like those haven't happened to me since my hair transplant grew in.
I'd like more hair, a fullish head of hair, but it's not like not having this would ruin my life.
Being completely bald though, no, no life is worth living as a slick bald man.
I've heard people talking about how in the not too distant future you'll be able to upload your consciousness into a computer, but they haven't even figured out how solve a receding hairline yet
Technology grows exponentiallyI think people are so excited by the rate of technological/ medical advancement that even the smartest experts are prone to hyperbolizing where we'll be in a few years. Take Elon Musk for example; he's developing self driving cars and sends rockets into space and he's fairly convinced that the entire human existence is a highly advanced computer simulation. When you look at the research that's being done, on one hand it doesn't sound cazy to imagine that designer babies will be plausible in a few decades, then you realize we're 7 generations into the iPhone and it hasn't changed all that much.
Technology grows exponentially
Well I was referring to your comment about iphones. But yeah, biology is surely moving at a slower rate than computing (3d transistors and carbon nanotubes ftw). Especially hair, the less people work on sth, the more likely it is for progress to deviate from the norm because of individual failures. I just hope that with the rise of stem cells and this zeroing in that's happened on Androgenetic Alopecia causes there will be even more efforts if the present ones fail.Yes, but unfortunately, what's pertinent to us as hair loss sufferers is bio tech. Technology in a broader sense is almost always referring to our easiest method of judging technological performance: computing capability. And even Moore's law is approaching physical limitations that will be a big challenge.
Biotech is a whole other ballgame because you aren't just dealing with transistors and chips and wires and display screens. You're dealing with the most complex thing on this planet - the human body. And it's ironic because just as adding newer, better features onto existing technology is exponentially easier than starting from scratch, biological evolution is theoretically accelerating for the same reason. And that's why it's so difficult to come up with solutions for what seem like simple problems, like hair loss.
I am desperate to improve my aesthetics, as many of you know. There are obvious things for me to do, but sometimes I get sidetracked or told to get lost or overanalyzed things, I finally booked an overdue appointment with an orthodontist today, for example, so in 6-12 months I might have properly aligned teeth that are hopefully white as well.
The conservative cost of a hair transplant is about ~US$ 10,000 once one includes plane tickets + hotel. It will probably improve my looks somewhat, what's the financial value of going from NW2.5 to NW1.5 for me? Is it worth the opportunity cost where that money would be spent on other things? Who the f*** knows, I'm not expecting anybody to have an accurate answer.
I know that my own hair would be better than transplanted hair for a variety of reasons. Perhaps Histogen will be available in 1 year in Mexico for only ~US$ 2,000, so with three trips and three sets of hotels, maybe ~ US $4,000. Will it work?
NO IDEA.
All we have from them, as far as I can tell, are some misleading pictures. It might be great to regenerate the hair that's not transplanted, for maintenance in addition to the transplant. It might end up regrowing hair in the transplanted area, causing that hairline to be doubly-hairy and stupid. It might be a cure. It might give me 5% regrowth. NO IDEA.