The finasteride trials concluded that less then 2% get sexual sides and not b**** tits so get your facts straight.
Easy, internet hard-***. I said that gyno (b**ch tits) is
included in that listed 2% - which it is. Also, anyone who actually believes that 2% figure is kidding themselves. Studies can tend to be a little biased, especially when millions of dollars become involved.
These sides subside once the drug is stopped.
Most of the time, yes. But that's not the case with gyno. Once you grow tits you have to get them surgically removed. Incredibly expensive and supposedly
very painful as well.
Sexual sides is not feminization.
So laying down in a tanning bed (that is traditionally used 70-80% of the time by women) indicates "feminization," but lacking the ability to screw your girlfriend and/or growing breasts does not? Solid argument there bro.
Skin cancer rates are increasing every year and though most skin cancers are curable, I am sure it is not a fun time.
Most skin cancers are really pretty mild. I've known lots of people that have had carcinomas removed and it wasn't that big of a deal. But yeah, skin cancer's a bummer. So too is the inability to have sex. Kind of difficult to say which one's worse. Maybe we should take a poll to find out?
Not to mention these other sides: eye damage, immune system damage, cataracts, skin wrinkles, general increase in skin aging and kidney stones.
Eye damage and cataracts? Non-existant if you're halfway smart and use eye protection, or simply wear quality sunglasses outdoors.
Immune system damage? Please, enlighten me. Many scientists claim that UV rays can actually bolster the immune system by creating vitamin-D, which ironically even has anti-tumor effects. This is also a contributing factor to why more people get sick in the winter than in the summer.
Kidney stones? Again, please enlighten me. Does the sunlight there in Po-dunk, Virgina cause kidney stones?
And skin wrinkles? Who cares about wrinkles, right? Only vain "pussified" men and women. Not a man's man like yourself who isn't vain whatsoever.
Not to mention the tanning craze is recent so I would not be surprised if skin cancer rate skyrocket once these tanners get older.
Uh.. the finasteride craze is pretty recent too. We'll have to see what happens with the long term effects of that as well.
The feminization of American men is a social issue so my support of finasteride has absolutely no correlation with a social issue you freak!
Excellent technique. Your illogical arguments are made even more convincing by calling me a freak at the end of your grammatically disastrous sentences. Well done.
Men who go tanning suck.......there is no argument. Though it is fun to watch you rationalize such a ridiculous act.
I agree that men who regularly tan are kinda lame. So too are dudes who shave their arms and legs. And it's laughably ridiculous when guys in the gym contantly look at themselves in the mirror and flex all the time.
My point is simply that we have no room to talk, and that we all do things that are pretty conceited and narcissistic, whether it's tanning, trimming our nose hairs, or worrying about hair loss to the point of taking prescription drugs. Looking at the big picture, no one on this forum (including myself) is really in a position to rip on people who tan - even a macho internet badass like yourself.