The fact that I had the foresight to understand everything that failed would fail since I came on the forums means much more. Also the fact that the smart people that were on the forum at the time didn't expect Aderans to reverse NW7 to NW1 means something. You clearly still do not understand in hindsight because Aderans did work. It did exactly what it was supposed to do, regrew some hair and provided maintenance. The science succeeded it just didn't make it to market because the market wants cures not maintenance.
Exactly what did I believe about Aderans, and when? Could you please remind me?
In my last several comments I have been making generalizations about the hair loss world as a whole. I wasn't necessarily relating my own opinions.
If you wanna talk about Aderans . . . they started off way back in the early 2000s hoping to functionally cure baldness. They figured out during the trials process that their DP cell work didn't have the potential for it and the researchers "reduced their expectations".
They didn't succeed. The project failed, and then it proceeded for another trial before the funding was cut.
Last edited: