- Reaction score
- 174
Conclusion: A caffeine-based topical liquid should be considered as not inferior to minoxidil 5% solution in men with androgenetic alopecia.
As a shampoo yes because you're washing it out after a few minutes. A leave-in liquid is different.Alpecin a caffeine shampoo already been classed as an ineffective product for hairloss and a waste of money.
Because there's a clinical study that suggests it's beneficial. I'll go with a clinical study over bro science.Why does this forum keep digging out 5-10 year old ideas which never worked? Plenty of people tried topical caffeine, it was useless.
Because there's a clinical study that suggests it's beneficial. I'll go with a clinical study over bro science.
Thanks darling. The study was from 2017. I'll look for the most recent Redbull study and will get back to you.Yes, a lot tried topical Caffeine since maybe...30 years ?
Are you serious with this question ? What is the next ? Massages ? leeches on the scalp ? Redbull on the scalp ?
Caffeine was totally debunked as a scam ( not only the shampoo...).
Redbull is quite promising it gives your follicles wings to fly up out of your epidermis, the only problem is the hair ends up sprouting out off the head and flies away like a dandelion seed in the wind.Yes, a lot tried topical Caffeine since maybe...30 years ?
Are you serious with this question ? What is the next ? Massages ? leeches on the scalp ? Redbull on the scalp ?
Caffeine was totally debunked as a scam ( not only the shampoo...).
maybe we can fix this with stemson scaffoldingRedbull is quite promising it gives your follicles wings to fly up out of your epidermis, the only problem is the hair ends up sprouting out off the head and flies away like a dandelion seed in the wind.
Nope but I'm more inclined to believe it than bro science tbh. Usually these studies list funding/bias and I don't see any in that one, but maybe they are straight up lying.Yeah and you think that research never lies? There were studies regarding caffeine shampoo and they were proved to be false. There was a big discusion regarding this few years ago.
