Don't Always Trust On Statistics, They Can Be Misleading.

[Swoop]

Let us look at the following studies:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812832

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10103-017-2232-8

Look at the statistics, looks good right?

Now go open up the studies and look at the actual pictures. Suddenly it gets very disappointing.

Bottom line is statistics can be utterly misleading for various reasons.

Ohw yeah and the last study really used growth factors derived from foreskin in combination with fractional laser therapy (wounding).

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Are you sure they're not just doctoring their statistics?

 

[pegasus2]

Don't trust anything.

 

[macbeth81]

Using my imagination since no pics.

Isn’t this similar hair count increase as Follica if you count their neogenic hairs?

 

[That Guy]

Can't see pics 0/10

 

[lemoncloak]

No pics OP is a phaggot.



Jk Ily Swoop

 

[abcdefg]

I dont think statistics really lie. Actually I think the statistics are the most objective way of testing/measuring almost anything. Its like painting though you need a lot of different colors in the right places to complete the picture of whats really happening. A few stats dont tell the whole story sometimes much like a few strokes of a paint brush dont paint a full picture

 

[Swoop]

growth factors only and growth factors + fractional laser therapy.

 

[Dante92]

Most statistics are incorrect and biased, 56% of scholars agree.

 

[macbeth81]

He went from bald and pale, to bald and lightly tanned. I recall the older study from years ago. Very disappointing.

 

[inham123]

It's disappointing for regrowth...but what about further balding?

 

[DoctorHouse]