Admin said:Id like to draw everyone's attention to the latest post about another doctor misinforming and misleading a consumer. His uneducated idiotic comments actually directed the user away from Propecia and towards Saw Palmetto, by scaring him with false comments about side effects.
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... ght=#62509
Doctors truly are educated, and well informed! :x
Admin
HairlossTalk said:Selective listening, really?
Okay... put your money where your mouth is.
Show me all the posts of people saying how their doctors were well educated and informed on hair loss, gave them sound solid advice, and that they're satisfied with their experience with their doctor, here on these forums.
I anxiously await your list of URLs
HairLossTalk.com
HairlossTalk said:Selective listening implies there are many many many more i am choosing to ignore. Let's see 'em!
HairLossTalk.com
Axon said:You certainly did make statements re: legal system as if you knew what you were talking about. Don't try to back out of your commentary about how lawyers take the majority of settlements. Do your homework before you make claims - it's that simple. You'll call me whatever when you respond, but in private I hope you take this point and use it to fine-tune your arguments later on.
I never called you a name except cry baby, because indeed, you are one. You get all bent out of shape when someone disagrees with you; last I checked, this is America (well, not THIS, but we're both US Citizens clearly), and that is our right. But that's typical of a Republican, I suppose. I don't like the idea of this bill in it's current form and I'd rather see it upped to a $500,000 cap.
Yes, a small percentage of Docs spoil "the whole bunch," and it is not much different on the legal side of things.
Odelay said:Axon said:You certainly did make statements re: legal system as if you knew what you were talking about. Don't try to back out of your commentary about how lawyers take the majority of settlements. Do your homework before you make claims - it's that simple. You'll call me whatever when you respond, but in private I hope you take this point and use it to fine-tune your arguments later on.
I never called you a name except cry baby, because indeed, you are one. You get all bent out of shape when someone disagrees with you; last I checked, this is America (well, not THIS, but we're both US Citizens clearly), and that is our right. But that's typical of a Republican, I suppose. I don't like the idea of this bill in it's current form and I'd rather see it upped to a $500,000 cap.
Yes, a small percentage of Docs spoil "the whole bunch," and it is not much different on the legal side of things.
:uglylol: I won't back out of anything because it is true, a large portion of the lawyers in these cases are taking between 20% and in some rare cases up to 50% of the settlement. I really hope to God you don't think the lawyers are working pro bono. You might want to read what I said before you once again put your foot in your mouth.
Once again let me add the :uglylol: because the babble you are spewing out in this post is comical to say the least. What in the f*** are you going on about? I really hope you are done with your tantrum there so you can dry your tears and move on, if that is even possible. It's funny you have to resort to name calling to try and get your point across, but that should be expected considering the source. :toma:
Odelay said:One of the problems is that many of the trial lawyers are taking up to 50% of the settlements, which is obsurd when they were not even the person that was injured.