Checking Back After A While--this Is Depressing

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Sigh. Socialism isn't communism. Can we just keep politics out of here. Go worship Stalin somewhere else. People are here for hair loss not to read political debates.

Nobody's worshipping Stalin just like nobody accused you of worshipping Hitler after you equated the biggest mass murderer in history with Soviet communism. By 1945, there were anywhere from 50 to 83 million dead and missing. The Nazis were the most efficient mass murderers over just 12 years of rule in Europe. Comprende?
 

Rudolphus

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
73
I don't get what the point is of posting a picture of a beautiful blonde girl next to an ugly black girl? It proves nothing. I could easily post a picture of a hideous white girl and a beautiful black girl.
The woman in the second pic is Aboriginal Australian. But I agree with you. There's no place for racists on this forum, and I'm glad that That Guy is now banned, hopefully permanently.
 

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Stalin was an even bigger mass murder than Hitler. My family lived under actual communism. My great grandfather first came to America to join the Army and fight Hitler. Later he emigrated to America to escape communism. He was very wealthy in Europe, but his family had most everything stolen from them when the communists took over, and they saw their friends and family taken to the gulags never to be heard from again. So excuse me if I don't take kindly to communist sympathizers.

Except that "father Stalin" is still highly regarded among Russians and Eastern Ukes in the same way many Americans have fond regard for Kissinger & Nixon(the doctor and the madman) who committed mass murder of so many Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians, Indonesians etc ad nauseum. Not so for Hitler in his home country where his legacy was a broken nation of Germans and much less the rest of Europe where the Nazis slaughtered millions willy nilly. I'm guessing your family didnt come from East Germany where our news tabloids often wrote about Germans shooting a few other Germans climbing over a wall while, at the same time, US-backed military dictatorships in Guatemala and El Salvador were murdering hundreds of thousands of indigenous people during the Reaganaut era. JCommunsim indeed. https://www.spiegel.de/internationa...eel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

My former neighbor was from Poland. Her father was a Jewish doctor living in Russia. He was sent to a Siberian gulag during the war. Apparently the pay was lousy, but it was still better than what the Nazis were paying at Auschwitz & Birkenau she said.
 
Last edited:

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
You just keep defending the murderer. Do you not think that Hitler would be popular in Germany if he had won the war? People in the countries he occupied feel very differently about him.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/world/controversial-statues-monuments-destroyed.html

Your view of history is very skewed. I don't think anyone but the most rabid communist would call Nixon a murderer.

No, not Germany, another axis-controlled country. They got free from HItler only to have all of their land and money stolen from them and be prohibited from practicing their religion because they were not Jewish.

I am defending the millions of genetically ordinary Russian people who beat the invaders back to Berlin and encircled the Reichstag before planting a Soviet flag of victory atop that symbol of oppression and mass murder. And that's all. Your beloved Nazis were handed their asses by a bunch of farmers, factory workers and peasants, many of whom witnessed the barbarous acts of Himmler's SS death squads inside Russia and Ukraine. The so-called master race and their corporate-sponsored military machine was thoroughly beaten by ordinary Rooskis in similar fashion to the way in which the most technically advanced army in history had their asses handed to them by a low-tech culture thousands of years older in Vietnam. And that's all i am saying. Twist that anyway you will. We know that you want to. Hating Russians and Russophobia has been a full-time job in Warshington since at least 1917. The pro war propaganda by our corporate news presstitutes is constant and pervasive. And your mind is a sponge for it.
 

jamesbooker1975

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,032
Lol. I am online since 1998 , hairsite.com , regrwoth.com ( both site "dead" ) and this one that arrive later .
You know what is the worst part ? That after all this year, after all I have tried, even so , without side effect, the best combo have being available since more than 20 years :
Minoxidil plus treinoin ( every day night lotion )
Ketoconazole 2% shampoo ( everyday shampoo ) .
Perio

Want some side effect, add topical finasteride, want more side effect, oral finasteride or oral dutasteride.

And that is all, there is nothing better. In more than 2 decades, nothing better arrive. Not even a damn topical antiandrogen that will be usefull in acne , male pattern baldness and hirsutism. Of course, that is Clascoterone ( aka cb-03-01 ) , that have being in clinical trials since 2003 from one laboratory to other laboratory (yep, almost a bad joke ) .
 

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Sorry dude, but Germany fighting on one front would have destroyed the Soviets, winter or no winter.

Sorry yourself because your bro history, and that of Cambridge and Princeton military historians, doesn't jive. Your beloved Hitler poured 2/3s of his corporate sponsored military machine into the heart of Russia. They stood alone against the Nazis for over two years while begging Roosevelt and Churchill for a second front, and more than just "sideshows in the Mediterranean." While millions were slaughtered in Poland, Ukraine and Russia, IBM, Standard Oil of NJ, Prescott Bush, Ford and GM all did business as usual with Nazi Germany up to late 1942. Genetically ordinary people turned the tables on the fuhrer's corporate-sponsored military machine at Stalingrad, Leningrad, and the largest tank battle in history at Kursk. Churchill & Roosevelt realized then that the Red Army could liberate Europe by themselves. Sorry, but you don't seem to know a damned thing about it.
 
Last edited:

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Lol. I am online since 1998 , hairsite.com , regrwoth.com ( both site "dead" ) and this one that arrive later .
You know what is the worst part ? That after all this year, after all I have tried, even so , without side effect, the best combo have being available since more than 20 years :
Minoxidil plus treinoin ( every day night lotion )
Ketoconazole 2% shampoo ( everyday shampoo ) .
Perio

Want some side effect, add topical finasteride, want more side effect, oral finasteride or oral dutasteride.

And that is all, there is nothing better. In more than 2 decades, nothing better arrive. Not even a damn topical antiandrogen that will be usefull in acne , male pattern baldness and hirsutism. Of course, that is Clascoterone ( aka cb-03-01 ) , that have being in clinical trials since 2003 from one laboratory to other laboratory (yep, almost a bad joke ) .

The good news is that although the big three, or big one or two, is still all there is, in 2012 a Nobel Prize was awarded for the discovery that iPS cells can be reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of developing into all tissues of the body. Their findings have revolutionised our understanding of how cells and organisms develop. The bad news is that science takes time. There are still no shortcuts in science.
 

SomeoneHasToSayIt

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
31
I wasn't trying to say that there are no differences at all between races. I was just making the point that the differences that exist are fairly small. Different genes do occur at different frequencies between different human populations, which accounts for the various visual and other differences that exist, but there isn't any one gene that is unique to any particular group, and there is vastly more genetic variation within each race than there is between races. And as I also mentioned, genetic variation among humans varies along a smooth geographical continuum across the world, meaning that it is largely arbitrary where we decide to draw the racial dividing lines.

So in view of these facts, I think there is a case for saying that maybe we shouldn't consider our race to be a major part of who we are. The fact that we are human beings is a major part of who we are, but not necessarily the fact that we are each a particular "type of human being".

That's a silly argument. There's far more genetic diversity within dogs of the same breed than between breeds, but any sane individual would consider breed a salient categorization. The same is clearly true of race (which proves its utility in medicine every day). I agree that it's not a super precise way of describing someone, but it's certainly powerful enough at a group level to be relevant in sociological discussions (not that modern politics would permit that...).
 

Michael1986

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
423
That's a silly argument. There's far more genetic diversity within dogs of the same breed than between breeds, but any sane individual would consider breed a salient categorization. The same is clearly true of race (which proves its utility in medicine every day). I agree that it's not a super precise way of describing someone, but it's certainly powerful enough at a group level to be relevant in sociological discussions (not that modern politics would permit that...).
Yes but there is a lot more genetic difference between breeds of dogs than there is between races of people. The biological difference between dog breeds also has more exact boundaries that are not as blurry as for human race. Having said this, there is something to the concept of race, and I don't believe it is entirely made up. And as you say, it does have significance in medicine. I suppose my point is just that the differences between races are actually very small in the general scheme of things. Humans are a very recent species in evolutionary terms, and we haven't had much time to diverge into different genetic subgroups. As a species, we display surprisingly little genetic diversity relative to other mammals. And I sometimes feel that considering how small the differences between races actually are, this world we live in (and the US in particular) seems to be a lot more obsessed with the subject of race than it really needs to be.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
66
Don't be so sure about that. Central banks can print their way out of anything until they can't. There's no way to know when that game of musical chairs will end. We only know that this crisis has brought us that much closer. As long as there is money to pay people's bills and get businesses running again then unemployment will go back to 10% or less very quickly. We are not currently facing another Great Depression. Thanks to modern technology things are unlikely to get that bad ever again because productivity is far too high. What you can expect to happen is UBI. We are not going to have another deflationary crisis, the problem now is inflation and then eventually war with China. It's inevitable, but likely still a decade away. Another 5.2 million just filed for unemployment, but Dow futures are currently up 844 points lol That alone should tell you that deflation is not going to be allowed to happen.

Money isn't made by being printed. It's made by loans, and you need somewhat viable customers for those. I'm not at all worried about the economy though. Boom/bust cycles are all contrived. It's not money and employment we should be concerned about, anyway, but rather the fact that absolute ghouls are running things and every single thing on the news is a lie. They set up hospital beds and they're all unused. The mortality rate for teenagers is 0%. The same people who lie to start wars, who lied about 9/11, who give you vaccines that reduce religiosity at the neural level, who put paint thinner in all our food (industrial PUFA oils are paint thinner)... it goes on and on. How do people walk around with masks and humiliate themselves by believing what CIANN tells them?

This all has to end eventually. For now I'm hoping to collect unemployment for the 8 months or so, even though I'm working for cash.
 

Xenophon

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
66
Yes but there is a lot more genetic difference between breeds of dogs than there is between races of people. The biological difference between dog breeds also has more exact boundaries that are not as blurry as for human race. Having said this, there is something to the concept of race, and I don't believe it is entirely made up. And as you say, it does have significance in medicine. I suppose my point is just that the differences between races are actually very small in the general scheme of things. Humans are a very recent species in evolutionary terms, and we haven't had much time to diverge into different genetic subgroups. As a species, we display surprisingly little genetic diversity relative to other mammals. And I sometimes feel that considering how small the differences between races actually are, this world we live in (and the US in particular) seems to be a lot more obsessed with the subject of race than it really needs to be.

Human races are more genetically disparate than are subspecies of animals, such as tigers and many other mammals. Yet here you are spewing these antifacts that you were forcefed by Big Science. Races are not only real, they're subspecies. If you deny this then you cannot talk about subspecies in any capacity.

And evolution isn't real you retard. The greater cannot derive from the less.
 

Michael1986

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
423
Human races are more genetically disparate than are subspecies of animals, such as tigers and many other mammals. Yet here you are spewing these antifacts that you were forcefed by Big Science. Races are not only real, they're subspecies. If you deny this then you cannot talk about subspecies in any capacity.

And evolution isn't real you retard. The greater cannot derive from the less.
I didn't say that race is made up. I just mentioned that the genetic differences between races are small. And the differences between races are certainly much too small to meet the criteria for considering races to be different sub-species. Regarding evolution, all the existing evidence points to the fact that evolution is real. And I'd appreciate if you don't refer to me as a retard please.

Anyway, I'm going to stop talking about this subject now as it seems to be causing people to become annoyed. I think that would be best.
 
Last edited:

tomJ

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
518
View attachment 141711

This is basically printing money. It doesn't have to be physical in this century. They can't unwind this. Central bank's balance sheets will just get bigger and bigger until the currency is worthless. That's when war breaks out.
Ok so what's your prediction for the next 12 months?..and if all countries areprinting, does that make it a wash? Meaning it wont affect the country's as much cause they are all doing it?,
 

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Money isn't made by being printed. It's made by loans, and you need somewhat viable customers for

From Lincoln's time forward, the US increased its debt by running a budget deficit. Governments spent money into the economy for infrastructure, education, roads etc. This is what allows economies to grow. That stopped during the Clinton admin in the 1990s. At the end of his 2nd term, Clinton fell for neoliberal voodoo that says balancing the budget is necessary and ran a budget surplus. So the government stopped spending money into the economy.

Governments can create money and run endless budget deficits because it's been done before and the sky didn't fall. Yes, private banks do create money but as interest-bearing debt. A banker walks over to a keyboard and enters a number into a computer. Our government guys can do the same thing but pretend they can't. They've been pretending they can't do this since Clinton's time in the sun. And repealing Glass-Steagall basically legalized bank fraud in America. The recent giveaways bring the total to $21 Trillion to bailout Wall Street for their gambling debts on world stocks and arbitrage gaffes since 2008. This is the thing which can not go on forever.
 
Last edited:

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Having said this, there is something to the concept of race, and I don't believe it is entirely made up. And as you say, it does have significance in medicine.

We share about 80% of our genes with cattle, and 60% of our disease-causing genes we share with fruit flies. You're 99.9% genetically the same as an African person. We share some large percentage of our DNA with lettuce. Unless your ancestors evolved on another planet, you're not special, bro'.
 
Last edited:

Michael1986

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
423
Recent research has found that human beings are actually a lot less than 99.9% genetically identical to one another. The 99.9 figure only takes account of genetic differences due to SNPs. But our genomes also differ in terms of CNVs, indel mutations, and inversions. The true figure for how genetically identical we are to one another is around 98.4%, as found in the research that is mentioned in this article: http://book.bionumbers.org/how-genetically-similar-are-two-random-people/.

From the last paragraph of the article:

"The ability to comprehensively characterize these variations is a very recent scientific achievement, starting only in the third millennia with the memorable race between the human genome project consortia and the group led by Craig Venter. In comparing the results between these two teams, one finds that in comparing the genome of Craig Venter to that of the consensus human genome reference sequence, there is about 1.2% difference when indels and CNVs are considered, 0.1% when SNPs are considered, and ≈0.3% when inversions are considered — a grand total of 1.6% (BNID 110248)."
 
Last edited:

NewUser

Experienced Member
Reaction score
305
Racism is not science, it is a social construct that began with imperialists looking to profit from any stupid idea they could come up with centuries ago. Some of us refer to 1.3 billion Africans and 42 million African Americans as simply 'black', but this is the most genetically diverse/ group of people on earth. There is no race of purely white people. Oftentimes, poorly educated supremacists will go so far as to research their genealogy and end up disappointed to find out their tree is riddled with nonwhite people. Then they accuse the companies selling test kits of being owned by Jews. The stupidity might be laughable if it wasn't so sad. Our so-called family trees begin to look like bushes and grape vines after n generations. All white supremacists are genetically impure, and all racists have African ancestors.
 
Top