- Reaction score
- 614
My plan is to fake endometriosis and get HMI through my national health service for free.My plan is to fake prostate cancer and get HMI through my national health service for free.
My plan is to fake endometriosis and get HMI through my national health service for free.My plan is to fake prostate cancer and get HMI through my national health service for free.
No dude, what you are describing is a corner case. We have multiple press releases and direct statements from their CEO talking about how the Androgenetic Alopecia trial will be happening. Unless you seem to think that every statement they've made is somehow now false, except that hairloss is the primary indication at the moment regardless of which trial was initiated first.Sure there could be corner case hypothesis, but we know where the probabilities are
I'm a whole *** man but I'm gonna identify as a woman (its 2022) just to get my hands on HMIMy plan is to fake endometriosis and get HMI through my national health service for free.
Sorry where do we get the Information that the alopecia trial got rejected?You're the one who who was speculating, causing him to comment. For all we know, they applied for both at the same time or the Androgenetic Alopecia one first and it got rejected due to the phase 1 structure or something that the FDA/Australian government didn't like in the trial design. You're the one that said they prioritize it less, which is something we absolutely don't know.
Lol at press releases. We’re past the talk the talk stage. Let’s see if in 6 months from now they have started the clinical trials for hairloss or not.No dude, what you are describing is a corner case. We have multiple press releases and direct statements from their CEO talking about how the Androgenetic Alopecia trial will be happening. Unless you seem to think that every statement they've made is somehow now false, except that hairloss is the primary indication at the moment regardless of which trial was initiated first.
I am saying it's all speculation. The only thing we know is that they said they intended to start it last year, but only started the endo one to date.Sorry where do we get the Information that the alopecia trial got rejected?
I think this was just speculation of us
If they have not, something will have 100% gone wrong.Lol at press releases. We’re past the talk the talk stage. Let’s see if in 6 months from now they have started the clinical trials for hairloss or not.
Tsuji if they have donor hair. HMI-115 might also work on alopecia areata. JAK inhibitors work insanely well for people who lose hair everywhere.for someone without hair the only option wil be stemson?
JAK inhibitors work insanely well for people who lose hair everywhere.
Well the jak inhibitor trial for Androgenetic Alopecia did show a result approximate to minoxidil, but of course that still leaves you very bald in most cases.The JAK results were so disappointingly clear. It's amazing for areata loss and yet it doesn't even touch androgenic loss.
No idea, sorry. I'm not familiar with Fukuda. I think he's the researcher at Yokohama, but I haven't familiarized myself with themthanks for info, what is the diferrence between Tsuji and Fukuda treatment?
The French fry guyNo idea, sorry. I'm not familiar with Fukuda. I think he's the researcher at Yokohama, but I haven't familiarized myself with them
If they question you it's a hate crimeI'm a whole *** man but I'm gonna identify as a woman (its 2022) just to get my hands on HMI
Ok, yeah that's Yokohama. The french fry thing makes me question their credibility. Idk if the association came from them or the media, but the chemical itself had nothing to do with Androgenetic Alopecia. They overhyped it. I hope they are not overhyping this tooThe French fry guy
Meh they're using a similar approach as Stemson but in a much worse position to commercialise. Sound technology but wouldn't put much stock in them panning out for us in the timeframes we wantOk, yeah that's Yokohama. The french fry thing makes me question their credibility. Idk if the association came from them or the media, but the chemical itself had nothing to do with Androgenetic Alopecia. They overhyped it. I hope they are not overhyping this too
So they're using iPSCs from blood? Frankly I have more faith in Stemson to solve it if that's the case.Meh they're using a similar approach as Stemson but in a much worse position to commercialise. Sound technology but wouldn't put much stock in them panning out for us in the timeframes we want
If anyone can pass the finish line or add competition for others to move faster, it always helps. If they're using the same approach as Stemson then it will hopefully make Stemson move quicker.Meh they're using a similar approach as Stemson but in a much worse position to commercialise. Sound technology but wouldn't put much stock in them panning out for us in the timeframes we want