Baldingblog.com Discussion

medmax84

Established Member
Reaction score
1
This thread is for the discussion of the daily musings of Dr. Rassman from Baldingblog.com.

Dr. Rassman is a hair transplant surgeon who routinely answers questions and posts thoughts about hair transplantation and treatments for male pattern baldness. His thoughts and answers serve as an excellent, medically-sound source for those seeking hair regrowth and maintenance.

His blog can be found here: http://www.baldingblog.com/

**I am in no way affiliated with New Hair Institute or Dr. Rassman. My opinions and others expressed here do not reflect licensed medical opinions**
 

$tackz

Established Member
Reaction score
2
He pushes Propecia like it's going out of style. Possibly a paid shill for Merck.
 

medmax84

Established Member
Reaction score
1
All physicians do. It is one of two FDA approved drugs for hairloss. Would you rather your physician violate the terms of his or her medical license?
 

$tackz

Established Member
Reaction score
2
He practice medicine, he doesn't have to enforce it with an iron fist. He's not open to any new ideas besides propecia, propecia, propecia. 1.25mg too.

Any side effect is wrong, or hasn't been studied enough. Anybody who had a bad experience with propecia doesn't know what they're talking about.
 

medmax84

Established Member
Reaction score
1
$tackz said:
He practice medicine, he doesn't have to enforce it with an iron fist. He's not open to any new ideas besides propecia, propecia, propecia. 1.25mg too.

Any side effect is wrong, or hasn't been studied enough. Anybody who had a bad experience with propecia doesn't know what they're talking about.

That is really not what he points out. He acknowledges the side effects and encourages those who experience them to see their physician and/or discontinue use.

The study Merck propecia study is fairly airtight. I read the whole thing in its entirety yesterday... both the first year, then the second year, then after five years. It is a well-conducted study. Propecia has low incidence of side effects. 2% of millions is A LOT OF PEOPLE.

If there are 2 million propecia/finasteride users that means that there are 40,000 suffering from side effects. Can you see how you still have a relatively low risk yet there would be plenty of affected individuals willing to share their bad experience online?

As an aside;

Honest-to-God, ED has to be directly correlated with libido decrease because ERECTION IS NOT MEDIATED BY HORMONES, IT IS MODULATED. This means that if you see a naked hottie, it's your nervous system that tells your peep to salute (vasodilation). Your autonomic nervous system, however, is a little less likely to do that if you aren't subjectively horny. Being predisposed or "horny" IS somewhat hormonal, and this is where lowered DHT may take some effect in predisposed people.
 

Lucky_UK

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
I have read many articles by Rassman, he seems to be well respected and knows what he is talking about, he does seem very pro-propecia.
 

Nathaniel

Experienced Member
Reaction score
3
Thats probably because there really isn't anything else you can recommend besides finasteride and minoxidil. I don't know many MDs who recommend dutasteride.
 

medmax84

Established Member
Reaction score
1
Nathaniel said:
Thats probably because there really isn't anything else you can recommend besides finasteride and minoxidil. I don't know many MDs or DOs who recommend dutasteride.

Fixed. :)
 
Top