evolutionary
Member
- Reaction score
- 0
It really depends on who and what sources you believe in regards to the science behind Tricomin. I read one source that said that Tric's clinical trials proceeded through Phase I and Phase II but never pursued Phase III because they didn't see enough results to make them want to pursue the considerably larger Phase III trials.
The other source I read said that the makers of Tric simply don't have the funding currently to conduct the aforementioned extensive Phase III trials. That is why as of now, the makers have chosen just to label Tric as a cosmetic product. Reports from the Phase II results say that Tric was about as effective as 2% minoxidil, so take that for what it's worth.
The maker of Folligen, who originally designed Tricomin before leaving, claims to have significantly more copper peptides in his formula than Tric. When I last used it, though, it left a nasty green tinge to everything it touched when it was in your hair/scalp.
I think when I finish the bottle of Tric I am using now, I will stop, and switch to spironolactone.
The other source I read said that the makers of Tric simply don't have the funding currently to conduct the aforementioned extensive Phase III trials. That is why as of now, the makers have chosen just to label Tric as a cosmetic product. Reports from the Phase II results say that Tric was about as effective as 2% minoxidil, so take that for what it's worth.
The maker of Folligen, who originally designed Tricomin before leaving, claims to have significantly more copper peptides in his formula than Tric. When I last used it, though, it left a nasty green tinge to everything it touched when it was in your hair/scalp.
I think when I finish the bottle of Tric I am using now, I will stop, and switch to spironolactone.