JWM said:Dave001, have you changed your opinion of 17-a estradiol?
He did consider it a worthy candidate at one point it seems.
JWM said:Dave001, have you changed your opinion of 17-a estradiol?
suicidedude said:I could only find these 2,
http://www.lef.org/newshop/items/item00320.html
http://www.lef.org/newshop/items/item00321.html
not Dr. Proctors Regrowth Formula.
JWM said:Check out lef.org. they sell a 'lite' version of Prox-N called Dr. Proctors Regrowth Formula, but even Proctor says it may be a better value than his Prox-N when taking into account cost and concentration of ingredients etc.
Dave001, have you changed your opinion of 17-a estradiol?
Bryan said:Proxiphen is "unquestionably more effective than Propecia", according to Dr. Proctor, although it's expensive.
Bryan
viperfish said:Bryan said:Proxiphen is "unquestionably more effective than Propecia", according to Dr. Proctor, although it's expensive.
Bryan
Do you believe this Bryan?
viperfish said:I find it hard to believe that proxiphen is 'unquestionably' better than propecia.
viperfish said:Is Proctor saying this because of the growth stimulants included in the formula.
viperfish said:I would think that using both propecia and minoxidil would be far better than using proxiphen. What are your thoughts on this?
Bryan said:(Picking myself up off the floor and dusting myself off...)
Are you referring to the before-and-after pics of the Proxiphen user?? You don't find THOSE convincing????
bubka said:I wish there were more pictures than just that one male pattern baldness one, even that is not that convincing, and the other alopecia areata does not really count for what we are talking about
bubka said:yeah, i mean thats nothing short of what we have seen here all the time with finasteride alone, conflicting with the Drs statement that was questioned