i agreeaskas said:The inventor just tries to solve the hairloss problem from another end. Quite clever. I think if such a robot is done well, it would be a cool substitute to masturbating (when someone can't afford to have a girlfriend), but it can't be a substitute to real sex no way. The problem is size, I would really be embarrassed if somebody finds out I have a doll. I can't get why not prostitutes? They are live at least. Not as good as real girlfriend, but still much better than dolls.