frankc said:
Hairloss talk.I don't think it is neccassary for you to steer people away from Woods.
We'll have to agree to disagree on that. I am here to educate my users and help them differentiate between legitimate treatments and doctors, and those treatments which have not legitimized themselves - and those doctors which have not done the same. Woods absolutely falls into this category. Therefore I can't feel comfortable steering my users towards him.
He has hidden all his practices and techniques from *all* of his peers both in australia and the united states. He has kept his procedure and tools secret and declined invitations to speak publicly in front of his peers about them. He refused to even attend at the October surgical restoration conference in Chicago unless they PAID HIM to show up (!!!!). He told them if they wanted him there they had to give him a free ride, and foot his bill of over $1,500.
He has held "franchise-like" conferences where he attempted to sell his procedure to surgeons willing to pay a him a pretty penny for it. This violates everything the Hippocratic Oath stands for, which he as a physician agreed to.
frankc said:
He is a legitimate doctor and the pioneer of FUE.
He may have an MD after his name, but legitimate he is not. None of his peers recognize him in the industry. He also is not the pioneer of FUE. Why? Because nobody is the pioneer of any medical technique unless they publish their technique and subject it to peer review. Woods has refused to do this because it would mean he couldn't sell the technique for personal gain. Rogue techniques hidden for financial gain and exclusivity not only violate the oath Woods took as a doctor, but they completely limit the availability of the technique to the rest of the world who desperately needs it, further violating everything Physicians and researchers stand for.
frankc said:
I am not hear to promote any doctor but just share my experience.
Fair enough, and you retain that right to do so. But I do need to warn and advise my users of the facts as well. No personal hard feelings towards you at all. I am glad it worked out for you.
frankc said:
As far as the other reputable doctors doing FUE yeas they are some but all in the primitive stage.
This would be remedied if Woods published his work. You can't fault these physicians for being in primitive stages while Woods unethically hides the procedure from everyone except those willing to pay him, can you? Any procedure can be published and learned. Woods does not have a magic wand. People can be trained, very easily.
frankc said:
And for everyones information Dr.Woods is now going to train doctors in this technique and help bring it to the United States.
Did he mention how much he charges?
frankc said:
As consumers I think the patient should come first.Anyway I am just here to share my experience and help otheres if I can.
If woods felt the consumer came first, he would not have hidden his procedure from the world for the last 3 years while all of us consumers continued to lose hair, live in desperation, and all of his colleagues begged him to publish his work.
Im sure he's a great guy, but he's not following the rules, and as a result, we cannot recommend him to our users.
HairLossTalk.com