so why ma i very healthy?It's irrelevant, neither me nor my father have used minoxidil and both of us have suffered from premature hair loss and heart issues. By some sick joke, Minoxidil seems to amplify the risk like how Propecia amplifies the predisposed risk of having low fertility
So hair loss is a result of sh*t health and genetic fitness, and treating hair loss seems to result in even shittier health
There's literally no hope or escape from this, people can laugh at me all they want. But it's the bitter truth
Tall men seem to have a higher risk of high-grade prostate cancer:
Height and Prostate Cancer Risk (nih.gov)
It's over for tallcels. Stop reproducing and allow the midgets to take over.
Antinatalism is either an utter retardation or a bad cope. There's nothing wrong with reproduction and having children since it gives life meaning and you can't be happy without a good family around you. Also those children will experience happiness and good moments even if they experience sufferingAccording to antinatalists it is better to not reproduce at all no matter how good your genes are, since it is guaranteed that you will suffer in some capacity in life so it's better to prevent that from happening in the first place. Interesting to think about.
"Muh humans are bad and should go extinct!" "Muh shitty animals are suffering because of the big bad human!"But if more human beings are born, total populations of animals probably drop due to humans' environmental footprint. Therefore, to minimize overall birth of sentient creatures, maybe we should increase the population of humans.
you can be happy without having children, children are just an expense that may never be recoveredAntinatalism is either an utter retardation or a bad cope. There's nothing wrong with reproduction and having children since it gives life meaning and you can't be happy without a good family around you. Also those children will experience happiness and good moments even if they experience suffering
HOWEVER, having children with dysfunctional, shitty genes is a selfish and an irresponsible thing to do since you're basically dooming your children to brutally suffer forever without giving them a chance to live a good life
Though then you are basically driving animals to extinction, which is immoral, but in the long run there is less suffering. Hmm.But if more human beings are born, total populations of animals probably drop due to humans' environmental footprint. Therefore, to minimize overall birth of sentient creatures, maybe we should increase the population of humans.
It's technically research since no one approaches premature baldness with the perspective that it's a health issue> research section
i am balding since my 20s, and i am very healthy, why?It's technically research since no one approaches premature baldness with the perspective that it's a health issue that's a result of sh*t genes
Basically to that they argue that pleasure and suffering is asymmetrical, so that in the case of someone not existing the absence of pain in good, but the absence of pleasure is neutral.Antinatalism is either an utter retardation or a bad cope. There's nothing wrong with reproduction and having children since it gives life meaning and you can't be happy without a good family around you. Also those children will experience happiness and good moments even if they experience suffering
HOWEVER, having children with dysfunctional, shitty genes is a selfish and an irresponsible thing to do since you're basically dooming your children to brutally suffer forever without giving them a chance to live a good life
Antinatalism is either an utter retardation or a bad cope. There's nothing wrong with reproduction and having children since it gives life meaning and you can't be happy without a good family around you. Also those children will experience happiness and good moments even if they experience suffering
HOWEVER, having children with dysfunctional, shitty genes is a selfish and an irresponsible thing to do since you're basically dooming your children to brutally suffer forever without giving them a chance to live a good life
Anti-natalists are either insane feminists who got fucked over by Chad, or some Incels trying to cope with not being able to have children. Don't take them seriouslyBasically to that they argue that pleasure and suffering is asymmetrical, so that in the case of someone not existing the absence of pain in good, but the absence of pleasure is neutral.
View attachment 172001
That's just what they argue, I can't say I personally care much if someone has kids (I don't want them though).
I am very healthy so I must be an exception to the rule, I have recently done a comprehensive examination of my body, everything is ok, I do not mind that I do not have children, so I have money for myself and I am going to invest in cryonics, I wish you much healthWhy do you act like you're 90 years old? My father had his heart issues in his 40's. Health problems don't have to happen to everyone as well. But you're still walking on thin ice for having those genes
I would not like to have children even being chad with a head full of hair, I want these look things for myself but not to reproduce, the world is so beautiful that I never get boredAnti-natalists are either insane feminists who got fucked over by Chad, or some Incels trying to cope with not being able to have children. Don't take them seriously
I am very healthy so I must be an exception to the rule, I have recently done a comprehensive examination of my body, everything is ok, I do not mind that I do not have children, so I have money for myself and I am going to invest in cryonics, I wish you much health