Follisket
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 288
I've been wondering. Why doesn't the hair transplant industry at least invest in developing a way of accurately predicting a person's max extent of baldness?
Wouldn't a reliable prognosis net them more clients? Especially those that can't take Propecia/maintain and need to know if a worst case scenario was still manageable.
I mean sure, unlimited donor hair would be ideal but since they clearly can't manage that, why not go for the next best thing? Just knowing how much you'd need transplanted to have it be over and done with would put many minds at ease. Unlike now where it's a complete gamble (even with Propecia - given that sides can strike at any time).
You literally don't need to actually affect or change anything about the scalp, just f*****g find a way to identify which follicles will eventually succumb to the ravages of DHT.
Surely they realize that the sense of insecurity and risks involved are the procedure's biggest deterrents?
Wouldn't a reliable prognosis net them more clients? Especially those that can't take Propecia/maintain and need to know if a worst case scenario was still manageable.
I mean sure, unlimited donor hair would be ideal but since they clearly can't manage that, why not go for the next best thing? Just knowing how much you'd need transplanted to have it be over and done with would put many minds at ease. Unlike now where it's a complete gamble (even with Propecia - given that sides can strike at any time).
You literally don't need to actually affect or change anything about the scalp, just f*****g find a way to identify which follicles will eventually succumb to the ravages of DHT.
Surely they realize that the sense of insecurity and risks involved are the procedure's biggest deterrents?