Because medications exist to prevent it and stop it from spreading, people like Pigeon can’t accept its an issue which originated in the 20th century, whereas before that, there was no ‘gay disease’.
Why Hair Loss Is A Symptom Of Aids And Why You Should Care
- Thread starter Kambrira159
- Start date
Because medications exist to prevent it and stop it from spreading, people like Pigeon can’t accept its an issue which originated in the 20th century, whereas before that, there was no ‘gay disease’.
- Reaction score
- 651
Perhaps. I’m not fully agreeing with him, but there is something peculiar with its spread even when meds/protection exist.
Just because it is not how nature intented it does not mean it can not be fun. a*** can be enjoyable, oral sex can be enjoyable. Both are definitely not 'how nature intended it'.
AIDS is a disease that is more likely to transmit with a*** sex (because sperm and blood) and from man to woman (because sperm).
Where do you keep on finding these websites... Have a look at some of the articles here. You will agree with me that this website could be considered homophobic?
Anyway, this article did not even make an argument against what I said. I do agree that HIV is more common in the gay community because this demographic tends to participate more in unprotected sex than any other. I just described how it is most likely to get transmitted. In the US 24% of the people with HIV are heterosexual and it is quit easy to infect a woman with unprotected vaginal sex as an HIV positive male.
https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics
I’m not too emotional to accept your ‘facts’ because they are not facts. You have shown a bias website which has a homophobic leader:
https://www.starobserver.com.au/new...so-has-a-history-of-blatant-homophobia/145412
There’s even a petition to ban their meet-ups in Australia: https://www.change.org/p/malcolm-tu...c-group-return-of-kings-meet-ups-in-australia
And, is it true that they believe rape should be legal in private property? If that is true, they’re not exactly the greatest source of information, are they?
It is being done by heterosexuals in the masses, it’s a regular situation. In fact, there are probably just as many heterosexuals who engage in a*** as homosexual men, since homosexuals are a minority whilst heterosexuals are a majority. Your HIV argument is invalid because it’s a 20th century issue, whereas before that, there were no issues with a*** sex. HIV can even be spread through kissing with the right conditions:
Nevertheless, protection along with the current medications to treat/prevent it transmitting are available. Once HIV is abolished, what is your argument going to be then? That it’s unnatural? Well, step into reality and realise that people want sex due to pleasure. I doubt you are wanting to have sex just to follow nature’s path of having kids. Admit that most people have sex for pleasure, admit it.
And, why is my sexuality relevant? I know a lot about sex, because I’m not exactly a virgin, am I? And, you’re right, your opinion on homosexuals isn’t relevant. You’re entitled to your opinion, but when you’re showing proof using a website where the leader allegedly says that rape should be legal in private properties. Even entering the website, it’s cringe worthy:
Regardless, watch the leader come out as gay. It seems to be typical, look at Aaron Schock, once homophobic and was opposing LGBT rights, now he’s a raging homo.
HIV is an issue within the gay community, it truly is. But what sort of argument is that to be against homosexuality? Are you against lesbians? Last time I checked, they don’t engage in a***.
You are fighting against a point that I did not even make... I shall say it again; HIV is more likely to transmit via unprotected a*** sex. It just so happens that this is a sexual preference in the gay community. Does not mean that heterosexual people are immune to HIV however. If you feel better by calling it a gay only problem, by all means.
https://www.returnofkings.com/14652...hobic-for-not-sleeping-with-gays-and-trannies
Many straight men fetishise transgender women regardless. The searching of ‘trans p**rn’ has been most popular in several countries.
Although, they have this image on their website upfront and centre. They need to be careful before they turn their audience gay!
Many straight men fetishise transgender women regardless. The searching of ‘trans p**rn’ has been most popular in several countries.
Although, they have this image on their website upfront and centre. They need to be careful before they turn their audience gay!
Reading their website, it’s pandering to conservatives. However, I’m a conservative and I disagree with them mostly on all LGBT situations. I am reading through them, and they latch onto situations and use it to be against the entire community. Although it’s important to speak out about the situations, such as the child drag queen in Canada, but then bringing up their only point they have against gay men:
And then you scroll to the comment section, and it’s almost as if you’re back on HairLossTalk.com:
I just found gold https://www.returnofkings.com/196245/2-signs-to-identify-a-liberal-in-disguise
Their first point is:
The best part is:
Their first point is:
The best part is:
Some more information I found about the founder of the website:
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
Apparently he’s a rapist...
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
Apparently he’s a rapist...
What a pos that guy is
- Reaction score
- 234
He was at the forefront of game, albeit a mental case. Now he's found god.
Pandering to incels, as per usual. It gets him the clicks, though.
Now we just have to wait for him to come out as gay or get caught making out with some random guy
That is the weakest comeback I’ve ever seen:
Look at the dates, they were based in an entirely different time; some of those references were based in the 80s, during the HIV/AIDS issue. They date back when homosexuals were heavily oppressed, many homosexuals committed suicide back then due to family disowning them. Where it states that ‘homosexuals pray on children’ most likely have a political bias due to the time, and that would be unsurprising. They probably based that on criminals who sexually abused the same sex, and labelled them as homosexual even though during the time it wasn’t well known that predators do it based on power rather than sexuality.
Take your weak attempt somewhere else, because getting your ‘proof’ from the 70s/80s/90s is truly a weak attempt.
Interestingly enough, you’re going to focus on his rape ‘allegations’ (although self-admitted), whilst avoiding every other thing posted. It’s a biased website and panders to incels, and you know that. You’re a well known incel, and you get your information from there.
I know there are many authors on that website, who said it was guilt by association? I stated it was the founder several times. Don’t try and debate with me, because if I actually cared enough to put the effort in, you’d lose. You have lost every single debate with me so far, so don’t try me b**ch.
I don’t need to debunk much because there is something called ‘bias’; you pulled your ‘evidence’ from a website that bashes the LGBT community regardless, it’s not exactly the best site for statistics if they have a political bias, is it now? I’m probably one of the biggest right-wingers on this website, and I know not to fall in the trap of bias, because it’s easily refuted.
One more thing: I wouldn’t take anything Roosh says as solid. That’s like believing Bill Clinton doesn’t rape children because he says he doesn’t, when in reality he has taken several trips to Epstein’s island on his private jet.
Oh my god, are you that brain dead? They’re from that period which does make them invalid, because we’re living in 2020 and not 19-f*****g-70. We do not live in a world where ‘50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuality’ (for example) unless you’re in the Middle East maybe?
Your sources purposely leave out that there are medications to treat HIV and do not mention it’s a 20th century issue, just to cling onto the belief that homosexuality is unnatural and disease ridden, when in reality, that’s not the case. A logical fallacy is ‘an error in reasoning or a false assumption that might sound impressive but proves absolutely nothing’. How does what I’m saying prove nothing? There’s nothing impressive about it, it’s three facts: HIV is a 20th century issue, it is treated by effective medications, and once it’s abolished, you have no legitimate excuses to be against homosexuality besides lubrication and procreation, even though sex for most people is for pleasure. And your constant pushing of ‘vAginAs aRe WeT’ is an absolute trash argument, and you know that, because almost every single man engages in oral sex, and I’m pretty sure the mouth isn’t nature’s desired hole, is it?
And yes, I am right-wing. My opinions on LGBT topics are based on logical reasoning rather than clinging onto NPC arguments, like you do.
You cannot debate to save your life, your debates are pulling information from Wikipedia whilst leaving out important details and not being able to explain what they mean. I posted about a Roosh and the motives of the site to explain that there is evident bias, because there is evident bias you absolute mentally impotent rat.
Roosh hasn’t been convicted because there’s no proof, although whose saying that he should be convicted? I’m saying that he’s inferred that he has raped people by self-implicating that he has. What normal person would write posts like that, just for fun? Just to try and get back at ‘leftist media’? No, it’s truly bizarre that he would create a post like that, and there is no denying that.