BitchBoy
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 3
It's known that anti-androgens cause regrowth in the sense of thickening existing hairs, meaning they must cause follicular enlargement. But how do they do this?
Is it that DHT in the follicle eventually dies but there's such an ever increasing onslaught of DHT that there is always enough in the follicle to replace what ever dies plus extra to cause a build up. And, when the this onslaught is reduced the follice enlarges because there's now more DHT dieing than is being replaced?
I have no idea is this is even close to what happens, it's pure guess work. Surely DHT is not an imortal cell so it must have a life span. Is it the actual presence of DHT in the hair follicle that inhibits hair growth or does it damage the hair follicle is some way that continues to effect the follicle even after the cell has died?
Any info, studies, data would be appreciated.
Is it that DHT in the follicle eventually dies but there's such an ever increasing onslaught of DHT that there is always enough in the follicle to replace what ever dies plus extra to cause a build up. And, when the this onslaught is reduced the follice enlarges because there's now more DHT dieing than is being replaced?
I have no idea is this is even close to what happens, it's pure guess work. Surely DHT is not an imortal cell so it must have a life span. Is it the actual presence of DHT in the hair follicle that inhibits hair growth or does it damage the hair follicle is some way that continues to effect the follicle even after the cell has died?
Any info, studies, data would be appreciated.
