person said:
It will be great if it can improve the thickness of grafts but what's the problem with FUE scarring; they are only tiny dots on your horseshoe no big deal. Yeah if ACell will just improve hair transplants this is still good as if a cure was garenteed soon I might try a hair transplant instead of bloody hair replacement.
Well that's the big deception. FUE is good for smaller areas. Also it is good if a person wants to modify the hair line. The problem with FUE is the doctors do guess work where they puncture the skin, and remove it. They are forced to do this since they cannot see the root. Also, the other problem is the grafts that come out of FUE are much thinner that FUT. All those Armani pictures you see online are taken in professional studios. Recall his older galleries where he supported FUT. The good hairlines with FUT only required about 2500 grafts whereas his FUE cases required 4000. Again once you extract 4000 through FUE you already reached the limit. Whereas as FUT has an average limit of 7000 grafts. Now imagine if the thickness level was changed with Acell.
As for results, I remember a couple years ago I was around a norwood 3. I took a picture at a banquet hall. When I saw the results with flash it looked like I had no hair loss problems at all. However, the same day I went to the washroom, and with all these bright lights my male pattern of baldness was exposed.
So far with FUT, the good doctors like Hasson & Wong have amazing results. However, they are so expensive. With FUE I was impressed with Dr Umar's work. However, if you really look into it, the picture show that its all thin hair.
As for bloody transplants, that's where Acell would kick in. Remember how the drug was first released ? It was discovered after a man cut his index finger, and then it grew back. Therefore, if Acell can heal a finger, it can surely heal a bloody transplant.
Personally for FUT transplants, I would only recommend the top doctors. Otherwise, I too against its just a bloody transplant.