Which is worse - Diffuse or Receder?

[RaginDemon]

I'm both. f*** aaaaallll y'aaaalll

receding up front, thinning all over top, extreme thinning at vertex.

I WIN.

I'd take a thick NW2 over a thin NW1 if thats what you're asking..

ditto that

 

[Barry_Blue]

I'm both. f*** aaaaallll y'aaaalll

receding up front, thinning all over top, extreme thinning at vertex.

I WIN.

I'd take a thick NW2 over a thin NW1 if thats what you're asking..

Same 'ere.

My hair is going the way of Steve McClaren

 

[BornBaldDieBald]

I'm both. f*** aaaaallll y'aaaalll

receding up front, thinning all over top, extreme thinning at vertex.

I WIN.

I'd take a thick NW2 over a thin NW1 if thats what you're asking..

ditto that

Diffuse is better if your just balding a little, but if it gets bad its looks horrible not matter what you do. The advanced stages of diffused balding make you look like you have a scalp disease, or are going through chemotherapy. At least with receding hairlines you can go bald with dignity, with diffuse loss, your just look like a douche. lol

 

[Nick4441]

I don't think either is any good...we dont't want any hairloss of any type.

I was a receder now after 6 months on finasteride i'm a thinner too...great... :shock:

If you are just a receder and can get meds to work to stop loss then hair transplant can put you like normal.

hair transplant is not so good for diffuse...so unless meds can give you the density back then...your stuck unless you spend loads on hair transplant and using all your donor hair.