I was watching Dexter recently and noticed he looked as if he were trying to hide receding hairline through out the first 4 seasons, however for season 5-6 he has a hair transplant which i find crazy seeing his hairline really wasnt that bad. Im just curious to know what norwood people think he would have been at before?
What Norwood Would Actor Michael C. Hall From Dexter Be?
- Thread starter cjeznine
- Start date
SuprisedGuy
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 9
I'm pretty sure he wore a wig before and for sure after he recovered from cancer.
He's an Norwood 2 maybe bordering on Norwood 3 in those pics.
He's an Norwood 2 maybe bordering on Norwood 3 in those pics.
twenty.five
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 1
What he has shouldn't even count as hair loss.
I've noticed or kept an eye on his hair for a while as my hairline is very similar or I think it is at least. I'd say he's 2.5 or a strong NW3, If you get such a thing?
This must be after his chaemo when he was growing his hair back.
http://www.thewestminsterpractice.com/b ... 68x667.jpg
Anyhoos, he's a great actor and seems a pretty sound guy from the interiews I've seen with him. Awsome in Six Feet Under and Dexter.
This must be after his chaemo when he was growing his hair back.
http://www.thewestminsterpractice.com/b ... 68x667.jpg
Anyhoos, he's a great actor and seems a pretty sound guy from the interiews I've seen with him. Awsome in Six Feet Under and Dexter.
TheGrayMan2001
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 18
twenty.five said:
That's stupid. He clearly has temple loss. He might even be using concealers.
twenty.five
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 1
TheGrayMan2001 said:
No, it's not stupid, it's an opinion. My opinion is that kind of hair loss is trivial and not even worth commenting on. I never said he had a full of hair or denied that loss was visible.
s.a.f
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 67
twenty.five said:
No, it's not stupid, it's an opinion. My opinion is that kind of hair loss is trivial and not even worth commenting on. I never said he had a full of hair or denied that loss was visible.[/quote:3e1l94dt]
Yes and that would be the opinion of 99% of people. Just not people who join hairloss forums.
mothernature
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 2
easily NW2
slurms mackenzie
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 6
twenty.five said:
No, it's not stupid, it's an opinion. My opinion is that kind of hair loss is trivial and not even worth commenting on. I never said he had a full of hair or denied that loss was visible.[/quote:90nybj76]
I think it would depend on the age of the person, you put that hairline on a 17 year old and they'd probably feel awkward about it. Put it on a 40 year old and I agree most people wouldn't class it as hairloss.
I can't explain why it's different, because from a scientific point of view it's the same amount of hair gone.
Unless he's the one on the right, in which case you can definitely see a small amount of loss on the crown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B08pNlEL_JA
This clip gives a better look of his situation. I dont think he used concealers or wore a wig I remember watching the Dexter and never even noticing until I saw this interview. Im pretty sure he just left the hair at the tops of his temples longer.
This clip gives a better look of his situation. I dont think he used concealers or wore a wig I remember watching the Dexter and never even noticing until I saw this interview. Im pretty sure he just left the hair at the tops of his temples longer.