Trichology. Beginning of finasteride risks's awareness

Prop

Established Member
Reaction score
1
International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery Task Force on Finasteride Adverse Event Controversies

April 29, 2011

Since 1998, finasteride (Propecia®) has successfully helped millions of men with androgenetic alopecia with a relatively low side effect profile. Recently, several reports in the media and health-related literature have described a number of younger men with androgenetic alopecia who claim to have experienced persistent sexual side effects following the use and subsequent discontinuation of finasteride. The International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS) has established the Task Force on Finasteride Adverse Event Controversies to evaluate published data and to inform and update our ISHRS members regarding the use of this medication.

To date, there is no evidence-based data substantiating the link between finasteride and persistent sexual side effects in the numerous double blinded, placebo controlled studies using finasteride 1mg for hair loss. Reports of persistent sexual side effects have come from a variety of sources, with some internet sites attracting individuals claiming to have sexual and psychological issues related to finasteride. While continued difficulty having erections after discontinuing finasteride has been reported in post-marketing surveillance the incidence of this problem remains unknown. This rare side effect is included in Merck’s patient product information in the United States, and in Public Assessment Reports of the Medicines and Health Regulatory Agency of the United Kingdom and the Medical Products Agency of Sweden.

The persistence of sexual side effects appears to be a rare event, and it has yet to be determined whether these recent reports represent a true causal relationship, or if they are simply coincidental and related to other factors such as the high incidence of sexual dysfunction in the general population, and/or the placebo effect. Also, little data is available concerning the medical and psychological workup of these patients to exclude other potential causative factors.

At the present time, the mechanism of interaction between the brain, 5 alpha-reductase metabolism, and hormones on sexual dysfunction is speculative and poorly understood. Clearly, this is a complicated issue, which overlaps with other disciplines in medicine such as Endocrinology, Urology, and Psychiatry. More research is needed to assess the actual incidence of side effects, to determine if there is a true causal relationship for persistent side effects, and, if so, to identify who may be at risk. We hope to participate in a multidisciplinary forum to further evaluate this topic.

Millions of patients have benefitted from finasteride with no side effects at all, or minimal and reversible side effects. It is important for the medical community to verify anecdotal reports, and, if necessary, conduct further studies so that accurate information may be given to our patients to enable them to make informed choices regarding the use of this medication.

The ISHRS Task Force on Finasteride Adverse Event Controversies is in the process of gathering information and forming an interdisciplinary panel to address these issues and to keep our ISHRS members informed regarding post- marketing adverse events.



http://www.ishrs.org/articles/finasteri ... cement.htm
 

Nex

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Good, I will be extremely interested in what they find with the study.
 

Wuffer

Experienced Member
Reaction score
46
I agree, this is great stuff. This should have happened years ago. I'm very interested to see what comes out of this. I'm also happy to see they are assembling a panel of multi-disciplined medical experts to analyze this problem. My big problem with Dr. Crisler is he's basically an endo, and he consults with other endo's. That in itself is very biased; his recommended treatment is always going to be hormonal, and any other treatment options aren't even considered.




Also:

This rare side effect is included in Merck’s patient product information in the United States

Is not true.
 

Mew

Experienced Member
Reaction score
1
Quote:
This rare side effect is included in Merck’s patient product information in the United States


Is not true.

It IS true.

As of April 2011, Merck has updated the USA Propecia leaflet to include persistent Erectile Dysfunction as a reported side effect (same as in Sweden, UK and Italy).

http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_cir ... ia_ppi.pdf

Pg. 3 - In general use, the following have been reported: breast tenderness and enlargement; depression; allergic reactions including rash, itching, hives and swelling of the lips and face; problems with ejaculation; testicular pain; difficulty in achieving an erection that continued after stopping the medication; and, in rare cases, male breast cancer.
 

Ende

Senior Member
Reaction score
10
Interesting. Wouldn't that open up for some law suits? That was not a part of the patient information leaflet when I began using Propecia 3 years ago.
 

Wuffer

Experienced Member
Reaction score
46
Crazy, that's brand new.

Interestingly, it still says:

Each of these side effects occurred in less than 2% of men. These side effects went away in men who stopped taking PROPECIA

Keep in mind Enden that this is listed in the: "In general use, the following have been reported:" section. This means they are adding it simply because it has been reported to them with increased frequency, but is not technically a known side effect from the use of the drug resulting from clinical tests. Unfortunately I don't think that alone could be used as any grounds for litigation, but maybe. In short, Merck isn't admitting this is a side effect, but just that it's been reported to them in some sort of significant frequency, and they are probably just putting it in their to cover their asses.

However, if the study in the OP does in fact result in this as being a conclusive side effect, I think a lot of you guys would have some good grounds. This is really good stuff, and i'm looking forward to the results; hopefully it leads to answers for you guys, and it's definitely applicable to me as a finasteride user.
 

Nex

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Enden said:
Interesting. Wouldn't that open up for some law suits? That was not a part of the patient information leaflet when I began using Propecia 3 years ago.

As far as I know this would not open up new law suits. To cover themselves even more Merck would be wise to inform all propecia users of the new potential side effects.

Correct me if I am wrong Mens Rea, as I heard you were a lawyer. This is based off of a commercial law course I had to take for my business program.
 
Top