Tom Brady

FSHGLD

Established Member
Reaction score
2
@ SemperFi

I think they're calling it a Justin Bieber haircut because he's now so famous than anyone with 'mid-length' straight hair will get compared to him. Also, the fact that it's mainly worn by young famous guys such as Bieber and Zach Efron kinda makes anyone who's a bit older look like an idiot by association.
 

TheGrayMan2001

Senior Member
Reaction score
18
Bieber's haircut is not just long hair, you guys are missing the point...you have to have Bieber-y hair to call it the Bieber cut LOL.

The Beatles had a lot of hair when they were young...I don't know how ringo's hair is. McCartney's thinned a bit by the 80s but he's kept most of it, doubt he's had any transplants or anything.

Lennon was thinning. I've seen a few shots of him in the 70s where he was clearly parting his hair in the middle to cover his temples. He just had slow recession, he'd probably have a lot less hair now if he had lived.

Harrison, I think, had a thick head of hair with no loss whatsoever.
 

SemperFi

Member
Reaction score
0
What the heck are you trying to say?

Again - you said there are plenty of haircuts more suitable for a man in his thirties than the one Justin Bieber has. And I said:

1. His haircut does not look like Bieber's one

2. The style he has, was already sported by Beatles, just to mention the most famous ones.

3. It suits him no matter how you call it.

What are you trying to achieve with an analysis of how much hairloss each Beatles member suffered, is beyond my comprehension...
 
Top