HLTguest said:
After looking at the pictures again, I have to say they look somewhat realistic I guess.
It just seems odd is all. If this apple treatment is really so great then why is it so unknown? Even Avacor and Procede get lots of coverage in commercials on tv and radio despite the fraud behind these products. Sof if procyanidin is really so great for hair why is it almost completely unheard of? Don't you think the developers of this would want to get rich? If this was a miracle treatment like they claim, they probably wouldn't even have to adverstise all that much since everybody would be talking about it already.
Where to begin?
Procyanidin B2 which is the key extract in Apple Poly is not something that can technically be patented, however a company can patent an extraction or method process for producing their given product including Procyanidin B2, the two are significantly different.
For large corporate investors this makes Procyanidin B2 a dead in the water investment and subsequently contributes to the fact that it is mostly unheard of.
Those who are pushing Procyanidin B2 by which Apple Poly seem to be the only ones have chosen their methodology for marketing and that is to use traditional Internet marketing and sales copy instead of TV/Cable campaigns which carry their own set of stigmas too!
For a moment forget Apple Poly exists and focus your attention on Procyanidin B2, there are many scientific white papers reporting it's potential effects which have been observed to be beneficial to say the least.