2020
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 50
The world's first cure for hair loss has proven to work...
- Thread starter 2020
- Start date
fuckbaldness
Member
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm 99% sure it's fake unfortunately
Sparky4444
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 44
wtf??? IF that website is legit, that is some lofty stuff on there...Can anyone validate the business side of this??? Where are all these clinics??
Sparky4444
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 44
..but they say they do injections...???
...so here we go again with aloe...I have an aloe plant and for skin inflames and cuts, etc, there's no doubt it is a miracle plant for that...zinc and aloe, uh??
...so here we go again with aloe...I have an aloe plant and for skin inflames and cuts, etc, there's no doubt it is a miracle plant for that...zinc and aloe, uh??
This, if their claims are true, will likely work. I read through the research section and its subpages. They claim that their agent is able to reverse fibrosis:
Their explanation, "nutrient deficiency syndrome" is also wrong as far as recent research is concerned. But that doesn't matter, because the effect which would make their drug work is not the nutrient supply, but the reversing of fibrosis.
So the interesting part is their claim that they're able to reverse perifollicular fibrosis. That would be a major breakthrough and, on top of that, would also treat male pattern baldness (which leads to perifollicular fibrosis) and allow for regrowth.
The only question is if their claim that they're able to reverse fibrosis if true. If it is, their treatment will very likely work. The other factors, i.e. the nutrients and the vasodilator, are not really of importance - we already have that and know of its limited efficacy.
And for those wondering about then it will be available in the western world:
Edit: Never mind this post. I should've read more carefully. They state they are able to reverse inflammation, but not fibrosis. This means they can only provide limited regrowth, i.e. in areas that are currently struck by inflammation which will ultimately lead to fibrosis. They can thus save the areas not yet struck by fibrosis by resetting the inflammation process back to zero, to a point before it triggers stronger fibrosis. But fibrosis itself will - at least according to the information they have made public, can't say anything about the non-public parts - not be reverted, i.e. no regrowth in areas that are already slick bald. Let's hope they have something up their sleeves they haven't made public.
The nutrients stuff is not really interesting, because nutrients are not the key problem. Many nutrient-based solutions exist and all of them don't work. According to their patent, they deploy a vasodilator in their drug, i.e. that covers the "increases blood flow" claim and is what minoxidil already does.
Their explanation, "nutrient deficiency syndrome" is also wrong as far as recent research is concerned. But that doesn't matter, because the effect which would make their drug work is not the nutrient supply, but the reversing of fibrosis.
So the interesting part is their claim that they're able to reverse perifollicular fibrosis. That would be a major breakthrough and, on top of that, would also treat male pattern baldness (which leads to perifollicular fibrosis) and allow for regrowth.
The only question is if their claim that they're able to reverse fibrosis if true. If it is, their treatment will very likely work. The other factors, i.e. the nutrients and the vasodilator, are not really of importance - we already have that and know of its limited efficacy.
And for those wondering about then it will be available in the western world:
Most of you know how slow the medical authorities work. I wouldn't expect the treatment to be available in the US, Canada, or Europe before 2018, assuming the longer estimate of 4 years made by the company.
Edit: Never mind this post. I should've read more carefully. They state they are able to reverse inflammation, but not fibrosis. This means they can only provide limited regrowth, i.e. in areas that are currently struck by inflammation which will ultimately lead to fibrosis. They can thus save the areas not yet struck by fibrosis by resetting the inflammation process back to zero, to a point before it triggers stronger fibrosis. But fibrosis itself will - at least according to the information they have made public, can't say anything about the non-public parts - not be reverted, i.e. no regrowth in areas that are already slick bald. Let's hope they have something up their sleeves they haven't made public.
I.D WALKER
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 869
Renew or get your passport papers in order folks it's Asia or bust.