- Reaction score
- 28
I've stumbled upon a very interesting development.
As many of you may be aware, dutasteride is the active ingredient in the brand name, Avodart. This medication is prescribed off-label to combat androgenic alopecia and literature on its efficacy and tolerability make it an appealing option for individuals that are not content with finasteride or simply prefer the strongest, well-researched option. Recently, Strut Health, a relatively new telehealth provider, began prescribing compounded dutasteride with the option of a topical or oral version. I very much appreciate companies that are willing to go above and beyond the generic finasteride and minoxidil, so even though my current dutasteride option is cheaper, I wanted to support their efforts and began a consultation.
For those that do not want to browse the website, here is the information on it:
Strut Health is an interesting player in the hair loss telehealth industry. As far as I know, companies like Hims, Roman, Keeps and anything outside of the ancient MWC do not deal with dutasteride, so this is a promising step for those that would like an option to address hair loss outside of the FDA approved catalog. In addition to topical versions of dutasteride and finasteride, Strut incorporates tretinoin, which as been shown to increase the enzymatic activity that converts minoxidil to its active metabolite.
Strut obviously put a lot of thought to make their own formulation as opposed to selling a consultation that can be transferred to a local pharmacy, but there is nothing wrong with making their own formulation. Again, just to be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with prescribing a compounded formulation of a proven compound as this allows a company to make more money from their customers through their compounding pharmacy partner. To some, it may seem a little shady, but business is business and companies want to maximize profits.
Here's where the problem began:
When I read that dutasteride was compounded with biotin, I became a little suspicious as dutasteride is already susceptible to diminished bioavailability if the formulation is tweaked and adding biotin further complicates the formulation. Since an oil complex within a soft capsule is the go-to vehicle when preparing dutasteride since it has low aqueous solubility, my chemistry orientated brain became more interested in how the tablet/capsule would be prepared and the reasoning behind its preparation which can usually be found on the information sheet.
Strut Health offers:
.1mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
.4mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
.6mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
I chose the .06mg Dutasteride + 500mg Biotin option and waited for it to arrive. To my surprise, the information sheet that came with the medication was for a different product they offer, and the compound was inside a transparent capsule in the form of powder. Powder formulation of dutasteride has low dissociation when ingested, and since the buffers and compound modifier are not included, I could not even follow their reasoning as to why this would be the prepared formula. I messaged the doctor, who had otherwise been very responsive when asking if I knew the benefits and risks, but he has not replied.
How compound looks:
My messages:
As I previously mentioned, Dr. Patel had no issue responding to me when we were doing the routine consultation, but a question about the drug's pharmacokinetics, and it has been 10 days without a reply. To confirm my suspicions, I requested the formula from their partner compounding pharmacy and they decline sharing the formula with my laboratory. Just for context, labs share formulas all the time since there is nothing proprietary about generics and it is in everyone's best interest to formulate the most effective compounded pharmaceuticals. In my opinion, this is unethical and I, or anyone who is interested in the product deserves to know why they are using a delivery form that is counteractive to the compound's stability and at least a list of the inactive ingredients. This leads me to believe it is of lower quality than that of other providers, and possibly, not efficacious at all.
What I will be doing:
Regardless if Dr. Patel replies, which I think he won't, I will be using high-performance liquid chromatography with a reverse phase C18 column (UV detector ~ 240 nm) to test the concentration of their dutasteride. Then, I will test the aqueous solubility by testing the drug's pharmacokinetics on our lab rats. As a control, I will be comparing local dutasteride in a gelatin capsule as well as brand name Avodart, both sourced from a local pharmacy. This is going to take some of my time, but I think it is worth pointing out which providers are reliable and which are not. I will be updating this post frequently for those interested, and for any practicing chemists, I would like to compare thoughts on this, especially if you are in the field of pharmaceuticals.
As many of you may be aware, dutasteride is the active ingredient in the brand name, Avodart. This medication is prescribed off-label to combat androgenic alopecia and literature on its efficacy and tolerability make it an appealing option for individuals that are not content with finasteride or simply prefer the strongest, well-researched option. Recently, Strut Health, a relatively new telehealth provider, began prescribing compounded dutasteride with the option of a topical or oral version. I very much appreciate companies that are willing to go above and beyond the generic finasteride and minoxidil, so even though my current dutasteride option is cheaper, I wanted to support their efforts and began a consultation.
For those that do not want to browse the website, here is the information on it:
|
Strut Health is an interesting player in the hair loss telehealth industry. As far as I know, companies like Hims, Roman, Keeps and anything outside of the ancient MWC do not deal with dutasteride, so this is a promising step for those that would like an option to address hair loss outside of the FDA approved catalog. In addition to topical versions of dutasteride and finasteride, Strut incorporates tretinoin, which as been shown to increase the enzymatic activity that converts minoxidil to its active metabolite.
Strut obviously put a lot of thought to make their own formulation as opposed to selling a consultation that can be transferred to a local pharmacy, but there is nothing wrong with making their own formulation. Again, just to be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with prescribing a compounded formulation of a proven compound as this allows a company to make more money from their customers through their compounding pharmacy partner. To some, it may seem a little shady, but business is business and companies want to maximize profits.
Here's where the problem began:
When I read that dutasteride was compounded with biotin, I became a little suspicious as dutasteride is already susceptible to diminished bioavailability if the formulation is tweaked and adding biotin further complicates the formulation. Since an oil complex within a soft capsule is the go-to vehicle when preparing dutasteride since it has low aqueous solubility, my chemistry orientated brain became more interested in how the tablet/capsule would be prepared and the reasoning behind its preparation which can usually be found on the information sheet.
Strut Health offers:
.1mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
.4mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
.6mg Dutasteride + 500mcg Biotin
I chose the .06mg Dutasteride + 500mg Biotin option and waited for it to arrive. To my surprise, the information sheet that came with the medication was for a different product they offer, and the compound was inside a transparent capsule in the form of powder. Powder formulation of dutasteride has low dissociation when ingested, and since the buffers and compound modifier are not included, I could not even follow their reasoning as to why this would be the prepared formula. I messaged the doctor, who had otherwise been very responsive when asking if I knew the benefits and risks, but he has not replied.
How compound looks:
My messages:
As I previously mentioned, Dr. Patel had no issue responding to me when we were doing the routine consultation, but a question about the drug's pharmacokinetics, and it has been 10 days without a reply. To confirm my suspicions, I requested the formula from their partner compounding pharmacy and they decline sharing the formula with my laboratory. Just for context, labs share formulas all the time since there is nothing proprietary about generics and it is in everyone's best interest to formulate the most effective compounded pharmaceuticals. In my opinion, this is unethical and I, or anyone who is interested in the product deserves to know why they are using a delivery form that is counteractive to the compound's stability and at least a list of the inactive ingredients. This leads me to believe it is of lower quality than that of other providers, and possibly, not efficacious at all.
What I will be doing:
Regardless if Dr. Patel replies, which I think he won't, I will be using high-performance liquid chromatography with a reverse phase C18 column (UV detector ~ 240 nm) to test the concentration of their dutasteride. Then, I will test the aqueous solubility by testing the drug's pharmacokinetics on our lab rats. As a control, I will be comparing local dutasteride in a gelatin capsule as well as brand name Avodart, both sourced from a local pharmacy. This is going to take some of my time, but I think it is worth pointing out which providers are reliable and which are not. I will be updating this post frequently for those interested, and for any practicing chemists, I would like to compare thoughts on this, especially if you are in the field of pharmaceuticals.
Last edited: