Targeted delivery to the hair follicle

Old Baldy

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
Dave001 said:
Old Baldy said:
I understand Dave. But, maybe if you vary vehicles you get the same "non-tolerance" benefits that you get when you vary "medicines"?

You know, keep the scalp "guessing". Never let it set up it's negative "defenses" against my treatments so to speak. My disease apparently sets up this negative genetic "attack" on things that want to reverse male pattern baldness? That, I would think includes delivery vehicles as much as "medicines"?

Gentically, my scalp "wants" to go bald. I believe tolerance, at all levels, should be avoided. Just a guess. I don't really know.

I don't think your scalp is giving the matter nearly as much thought as you suggest. ;) As far as the barrier is concerned, the most sensible approach is to avoid too much irritation, and take ocassional breaks, etc.

Yes, probably not. You explained it better than me. Keep irritation down and take a break once in a while. My way is overstated and a little too drastic. Taking a break once in a while covers it pretty well.
 

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
Dave.. if you're just going to keep asking questions..don't bother. You and Bryan both have a habit of throwing out "what's your point?" "Huh?"

Your last sentence
I don't have any reason to think it does anything at all.
is just plain stupid. You "complain" in your response that a claim is just a company's claim..then you basically do the same thing, even though it's obvious it does do something "at all".
 

Dave001

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
Jacob said:
Dave.. if you're just going to keep asking questions..don't bother. You and Bryan both have a habit of throwing out "what's your point?" "Huh?"

I'll clarify the intent of my original question. You wrote: "Notice they didn't talk about using a liposomal type carrier."

I then asked what your point was, because it wasn't clear from the original context what you were insinuating. I've seen lots of material that hasn't said a word about liposomes. I don't recall a single word from Dr. Seuss bearing any semblance to "liposome." I guess you could even say that I'm used to not hearing about liposomes, so you'll have to forgive me if its absence doesn't have any intrinsic significance, and nothing from what you said gave any indication of why their failure to mention liposomes is important.

Jacob said:
Your last sentence
I don't have any reason to think it does anything at all.
is just plain stupid.

Why is it stupid?

Jacob said:
You "complain" in your response that a claim is just a company's claim..then you basically do the same thing, even though it's obvious it does do something "at all".

Huh?
 

Old Baldy

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
I'm going to put on my "old school marm" face here and say that I think Dave, Jacob and Joe are VERY intelligent men. A little wacko but intelligent nonetheless.

We're all stupid and idiotic now and then.

I'll say this AGAIN - I wish Jacob would get into making his own stuff. I think he would be good at it! You know, new ideas, new concoctions, etc.

Ok, I'll get of my soapbox now. :lol:
 

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
Either Dave is stupid or is playing stupid...so I disagree with you there Old Baldy.
 

Dave001

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
Old Baldy said:
I'm going to put on my "old school marm" face here and say that I think Dave, Jacob and Joe are VERY intelligent men. A little wacko but intelligent nonetheless.

I don't take offense to being called a wacko, but lumping me into the same sentence as Jacob and Joe like that is just plain malevolent.
 

Old Baldy

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
Dave001 said:
Old Baldy said:
I'm going to put on my "old school marm" face here and say that I think Dave, Jacob and Joe are VERY intelligent men. A little wacko but intelligent nonetheless.

I don't take offense to being called a wacko, but lumping me into the same sentence as Jacob and Joe like that is just plain malevolent.

:lol: :lol: Like I said, "a little wacko"!! No where near as bad as me but you're getting there.

(Each of you have your strong points. Each of you are very bright. It's just that simple. :wink: )

I will say this though Dave, you have an understanding of physiology that is extremely good IMHO. I can't hold a candle to you in that area. Not even CLOSE. (And that's, just that simple.)
 
Top