Bash said:
yes, I guess i am questioning your right to express your views. The right to reassure people even if possibly with a lie.
You have no right to question my right. And now I expect you to quote specific words and tell me where I am wrong. I am getting tired of this.
My ARGUMENT to most of your scientific claims is simple...how do you really know if they're true if you haven't heard of their validity personally? If the knowledge has just been handed down to you and is untried?
I know the FDA trials results hold much more validity than any testimonial.
Thousands of lab-rats are better than one, even if according to your system of evaluation it has gone through all hair loss hell. I wouldn't take anyone's word for granted. I am very, VERY careful when I phrase my opinion- if you search through my posts you will verify this. If you think that by having a few years of hair loss history behind you you will make me weigh yours or anyone's views differently, then you are terribly wrong.
Don't tell a panicked poster to calm down if you can't back up the reason to why he should.
The reason why he should is that hairloss treatments prerequire consistency to give fruits. And sheds are expected. You are doing much more damage by spreading panic through bashlike posts.
because you just don't know, do you?
But if were 6 years of propecia with gyno, e.d and no bodyhair I would know, right? If you are going to start giving advice according to your personal experience when you complete your qualification trials then don't bother, cause you are not meeting my criteria.
in fact I know that one of the pillars of science is having solid observable facts.
Who said otherwise?
I believe a panic is just as valid an expression as any other and should not be subdued with some widespread knowledge that has been unproven at a personal level.
You are being so demagogic here, I should stop talking to you for this very sentence. Did I ever say that panic is not a valid expression? (btw "personal level proof" is a great term- congratulations).
The panic should be acknowledged as it leads to questions....which in my opinion should be answered honestly from personal experince as well as scientific backing.
So you have obviously interpreted my suggestion to ride it out as a "STFU", right? I believe you see them how you want them. I wouldn't want your "personal level proof" for sure.
I'm looking for a fellow sufferer to tell me what they've gone through, not just information handed to me from an unquestionable pedistal.
You are looking for a fellow sufferer so that you can growl "aaaargh" together under the full moon, your valid expression of agony which will lead to questions. Yes, I know.
I guess I should let the 6y into finasteride md2002 poster wonder why he is shedding while he has halved his daily finasteride dosage. Because... who knows?
Well Bash no one knows. You are preaching in favor of a new ranking system judging credibility according to personal experience. We are not a pack of lions to respect the elder male here. We are in a discussion forum and every view has questionable weight. If you want to counter any of my destructive posts do it on site please. And say why you think it is wrong.
Protesting in favour of your right and anyones right to spread panic undisturbed is as pathetic as reassuring others to reassure yourself. I have never done either.
Logic spits in the face of personal experience. It always did.