Someone Should Join Cassiopeia's Acne Study For Winlevi (cb-03-01) And Send It To A Lab

[Dolph]

any of you chrome domes also a pizza face? phase III (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02608450) is recruiting in the US at https://usacnestudy.com/

one of the many problems with CB from places like wuhan pharma etc is that we don't have a reference molecule to do a good NMR on. the people who claim they have done independent analysis of CB have never posted lab results. if someone can get their hands on this cream, we might be able to actually confirm the overseas stuff, or even better, get a lab to start making it.

 

[mr_robot]

any of you chrome domes also a pizza face? phase III (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02608450) is recruiting in the US at https://usacnestudy.com/

one of the many problems with CB from places like wuhan pharma etc is that we don't have a reference molecule to do a good NMR on. the people who claim they have done independent analysis of CB have never posted lab results. if someone can get their hands on this cream, we might be able to actually confirm the overseas stuff, or even better, get a lab to start making it.

Yeah because that would not be against the terms of the joining the trial.

 

[Dolph]

Who cares? It's not like anyone ordering bootleg CB is abiding by the law either.

 

[Swoop]

I have posted results from like 5 years ago. Community already had legit CB-03-01 back then.

Here it is: http://docdro.id/8JChO9V

CB-03-01 is not "side effect free" for everyone and is not a strong puppy, most likely even less strong than RU58841.

Truth.

 

[Swoop]

NMR and FTIR references can be picked out of the patent and AFAIK someone performed FTIR also back then.

 

[Dolph]

I would love to see a link to independent analysis of any of the CB coming from China (Wuhan, Kane, whoever else). You, hilbert, Bearded, and a couple other posters have all mentioned independently analyzed CB-03-01, but I haven't seen any of this data -- I've only seen NMR run by the Chinese labs themselves, which is obviously a conflict of interest. The Swiss lab I talked to about analysis said it would be easy to identify a similar-enough molecule, but that high confidence is hard without an actual reference.

 

[Dolph]

On a separate note, if it's been 5 years, has anyone been using it nearly that long? CB's pricey but still not as bad as a hair transplant and seems like the most promising currently-available treatment if what's out there is legit. I used it for a bit and maintained but got sketched out by the fact that I was putting some unknown white powder into my bloodstream.

 

[Swoop]

I would love to see a link to independent analysis of any of the CB coming from China (Wuhan, Kane, whoever else). You, hilbert, Bearded, and a couple other posters have all mentioned independently analyzed CB-03-01, but I haven't seen any of this data -- I've only seen NMR run by the Chinese labs themselves, which is obviously a conflict of interest. The Swiss lab I talked to about analysis said it would be easy to identify a similar-enough molecule, but that high confidence is hard without an actual reference.

The NMR I just posted isn't run by a "Chinese lab themselves", the CB-03-01 had been ordered by a Korean forum member (who is a doctor) and tested in south Korea. It was a blind independent 3rd party test.

Polish forum members also ordered from Kane and they tested his CB-03-01. Again, identity and purity match. And private forums have also sourced the compound through other labs.

On a separate note, if it's been 5 years, has anyone been using it nearly that long? CB's pricey but still not as bad as a hair transplant and seems like the most promising currently-available treatment if what's out there is legit. I used it for a bit and maintained but got sketched out by the fact that I was putting some unknown white powder into my bloodstream.

Not that I know of. Back then it was even more expensive than it is now.

 

[Dolph]

CB-03-01 is not "side effect free" for everyone

Well, neither is water when you account for nocebo, but yeah, I've seen people complain about CB too. God damn these AR inhibitors.

the CB-03-01 had been ordered by a Korean forum member (who is a doctor) and tested in south Korea. It was a blind independent 3rd party test.

Ah interesting, I figured that came from a manufacturer -- thanks for the link.

I still want someone to steal some trade secrets from the acne trial even if we only get better insight about a vehicle

 

[mr_robot]

Who cares? It's not like anyone ordering bootleg CB is abiding by the law either.

There is a big difference, you'ill be signing a legally binding document that would allow them to sue you for megabucks if you got caught. Where as with buying bootleg CB they would have to prove a material loss which is why they would never bother. Anyone that stupid deserves to be caught.

 

[hilbert]

any of you chrome domes also a pizza face? phase III (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02608450) is recruiting in the US at https://usacnestudy.com/

one of the many problems with CB from places like wuhan pharma etc is that we don't have a reference molecule to do a good NMR on. the people who claim they have done independent analysis of CB have never posted lab results. if someone can get their hands on this cream, we might be able to actually confirm the overseas stuff, or even better, get a lab to start making it.

you dont need a ref molecule for nmr, but a spectrum.
and in cosmo paper there's plenty of info.
enough for a proper comparison, according to the guy at the uni chem lab.