Some additional anti-Foote evidence for everyone to ponder!
- Thread starter Bryan
- Start date
powersam
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 18
Bryan said:Well, you used to say in your sig file that you were in sort of a quandary about whom to believe: me, or Stephen. Have you made a decision on that, yet?
nope still not decided. every time you have an argument i have to look up all the things i dont understand, so though im learning a lot i still dont understand enough to take a side.
michael barry
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 14
Im going to weigh in one more time on this................................
If some company had been willing to make RU58841, and sell it for about thirty bucks a month for perhaps 2ml woth of it, put it in a sprayer, and let you buy about three months worth of it at a time.................................................and especially if it was generic by now.
..........................then in my opinion there would be very little griping on hair forums. Men would be willing to use it (much more than finasteride), and it would have basically stopped further loss. So guys who got on it when they first started receeding would pretty much have the same hair for many, many, many years. There is no need for "regrowth" if you can stop the loss early enough.
spironolactone is something alot of men aren't going to fool with. RU was the potential "bomb" for hairloss in my opinion.
If RU had debuted, there would be not alternative theories going on about hairloss. Cloning research would probably have been primarily done to lower hairlines on folks who had super high hairlines and to give hair back to men who had already lost too much hair.
Theoretically speaking a super topical receptor blocker (especially if one could add something topically that did in fact inhibit alpha five also with no systemic effect) would have been all men would have needed. Until we have one, men will have to combine some growth stimulant unless they are willing to do the finas and spironolactone together to hold the line.
That little French company, in my opinion, could have stopped all the alternate theories if they would have just made that drug. I really think the ability of it to more-or-less halt further baldness would have been that good. Its a shame.
If some company had been willing to make RU58841, and sell it for about thirty bucks a month for perhaps 2ml woth of it, put it in a sprayer, and let you buy about three months worth of it at a time.................................................and especially if it was generic by now.
..........................then in my opinion there would be very little griping on hair forums. Men would be willing to use it (much more than finasteride), and it would have basically stopped further loss. So guys who got on it when they first started receeding would pretty much have the same hair for many, many, many years. There is no need for "regrowth" if you can stop the loss early enough.
spironolactone is something alot of men aren't going to fool with. RU was the potential "bomb" for hairloss in my opinion.
If RU had debuted, there would be not alternative theories going on about hairloss. Cloning research would probably have been primarily done to lower hairlines on folks who had super high hairlines and to give hair back to men who had already lost too much hair.
Theoretically speaking a super topical receptor blocker (especially if one could add something topically that did in fact inhibit alpha five also with no systemic effect) would have been all men would have needed. Until we have one, men will have to combine some growth stimulant unless they are willing to do the finas and spironolactone together to hold the line.
That little French company, in my opinion, could have stopped all the alternate theories if they would have just made that drug. I really think the ability of it to more-or-less halt further baldness would have been that good. Its a shame.
michael barry
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 14
You have a point there...............he probably would. However, as long as men were keeping their hair and not losing more of it with RU.............I dont think that they would really care to be honest with you. It would fall on deaf ears.
Only the shampoo guys (the most ridiculous theory Ive seen and profoundly easily disprovable) really garner many followers, and Ive seen tons of guys who gave that about 2 years or so and come back to their senses to the hormonal cause of baldness.
Only the shampoo guys (the most ridiculous theory Ive seen and profoundly easily disprovable) really garner many followers, and Ive seen tons of guys who gave that about 2 years or so and come back to their senses to the hormonal cause of baldness.