I have been trolling the forums for around 1-2 hours now and it appears most people use the "Big 3" for their regiment.
With recent studies coming out on Propecia/Finasteride I am fairly concerned about going down this path and honestly think going bald is less important to me than the possibility of functionality loss as well as the ability to have kids.
So my question is, will "The Big 2" be worth it when the anti-androgen is removed from the equation?
Technically I will be promoting hair growth, but not accounting for hair loss in any way. My concern is that the initial shed will be more detrimental to my "balding timeline" because I am not stopping the loss.
To shed and grow, or to... hope it just goes slow.
With recent studies coming out on Propecia/Finasteride I am fairly concerned about going down this path and honestly think going bald is less important to me than the possibility of functionality loss as well as the ability to have kids.
So my question is, will "The Big 2" be worth it when the anti-androgen is removed from the equation?
Technically I will be promoting hair growth, but not accounting for hair loss in any way. My concern is that the initial shed will be more detrimental to my "balding timeline" because I am not stopping the loss.
To shed and grow, or to... hope it just goes slow.