This website claims in its men's hair loss guide and review of propecia that a shampoo with ketoconazole like Nizoral must be used with any hair loss treatment and no other treatment will work without it. I know the study where ketoconazole 2% increased hair shaft diameter, but their is nothing I can find to back the claim that it is necessary for any treatment.
For one, the propecia FDA trials used a tar-based shampoo and two, not for the purpose of ensuring efficacy of propecia. The clinical studies information for the drug listed on rxlist states:
"In order to prevent seborrheic dermatitis which might confound the assessment of hair growth in these studies, all men, whether treated with finasteride or placebo, were instructed to use a specified, medicated, tar-based shampoo (Neutrogena T/Gel® Shampoo) during the first 2 years of the studies."
Meaning in order to precisely measure hair count, shaft diameter, etc, they prevented a separate condition which may only prevent those assessments from being taken as well as they need to be in a scientific study. This does not mean seborrheic dermatitis will effect hair growth or the efficacy of propecia. As of course, there are men with this condition or other scalp conditons who don't bald, and men who do bald without scalp conditions. And they didn't even use ketoconazole in the study so I don't know why it's stated on this site that they did, let alone why it's necessary. Wouldn't Merck, medical literature, and doctors state if it's necessary to use a shampoo and/or treat scalp conditions completely if it was in fact necessary or even beneficial while using propecia?
I'm all for keeping a healthy scalp and attacking from all angles, but I can't see the necessity and how not using certain shampoos and preventing common scalp conditions would prevent the efficacy of a treatment like propecia. Is there anyone here with dandruff or more who has had results from Propecia?
For one, the propecia FDA trials used a tar-based shampoo and two, not for the purpose of ensuring efficacy of propecia. The clinical studies information for the drug listed on rxlist states:
"In order to prevent seborrheic dermatitis which might confound the assessment of hair growth in these studies, all men, whether treated with finasteride or placebo, were instructed to use a specified, medicated, tar-based shampoo (Neutrogena T/Gel® Shampoo) during the first 2 years of the studies."
Meaning in order to precisely measure hair count, shaft diameter, etc, they prevented a separate condition which may only prevent those assessments from being taken as well as they need to be in a scientific study. This does not mean seborrheic dermatitis will effect hair growth or the efficacy of propecia. As of course, there are men with this condition or other scalp conditons who don't bald, and men who do bald without scalp conditions. And they didn't even use ketoconazole in the study so I don't know why it's stated on this site that they did, let alone why it's necessary. Wouldn't Merck, medical literature, and doctors state if it's necessary to use a shampoo and/or treat scalp conditions completely if it was in fact necessary or even beneficial while using propecia?
I'm all for keeping a healthy scalp and attacking from all angles, but I can't see the necessity and how not using certain shampoos and preventing common scalp conditions would prevent the efficacy of a treatment like propecia. Is there anyone here with dandruff or more who has had results from Propecia?
