I think its been said men on propecia have substantially higher numbers of receptors compared to men not on it. I know some have said its not a big deal, but the guys that partnered with cosmo for CB specifically say that balding men have over expression of receptors compared to non balding men. So it begs the question how important is a big increases in receptors in terms of hair loss? It must be important to some extent if they are pointing that out and basing a treatment on interfering with the androgen/receptor interactions.
Your thoughts? How big a role if any do the number of receptors play in hair loss or are there any good studies done on this or how propecia changes this?
http://intrepidthera.com/development...-for-alopecia/
"Hair loss is known to be dependent on dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which is converted from testosterone by the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase. In addition, there is over-expression of androgen receptors in balding scalps compared with non-balding scalps."
Your thoughts? How big a role if any do the number of receptors play in hair loss or are there any good studies done on this or how propecia changes this?
http://intrepidthera.com/development...-for-alopecia/
"Hair loss is known to be dependent on dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which is converted from testosterone by the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase. In addition, there is over-expression of androgen receptors in balding scalps compared with non-balding scalps."
