Rivertown Rt1640 Looking Pretty Ok - Shows Patient Growth.

[baldingAF]

The patent shows regrowth in older balding gentleman as well as improving density of beard hair in younger lad which is something new. Reading through the studies posted in the patent you'll see that their primary compound (rt 175) only works in conjunction with cyclosporine.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20170042859.pdf

pictures are crap but its something i suppose.....

 

[tzt]

the images have a resolution of 10x10 pixels

 

[Blackber]

Pictures are crap as usual.

A lot of them are taken from different angles.

There's one picture that might show some actual growth, but again, the quality is terrible.

 

[resu]

Here are all the pics:

Looks promising but it's not a cure.

 

[pegasus2]

I'm open-minded about this one. I'm waiting for more information, but these pictures are worthless.

 

[Pelopeleon]

Do they actually take crappy photos like these in a deliberate way?

 

[abcdefg]

Okay so a few guys on a dangerous drug cyclosporine also took this other crap at the same time. Then they went from Norwood 7 chrome domes to Norwood 7 chrome domes. What an improvement you can barely tell they were ever going bald am I right?
Its like saying you went from 400 pounds to 380 pounds. Yeah good, but your still way fat.

 

[paxis]

"Hey we need to make pictures to show people that our product is effective."
"Here you go fam. Take my toaster, it makes excellent photos."

 

[Grasshüpfer]

Here are all the pics:

Looks promising but it's not a cure.

 

[GiveMeAccessToMyAccount]

Lol those pics are awful. They must be on a really, really, really tight budget and got their camera off of ebay. Like a 20 year old camera or something.

 

[resu]

It's always like this with all these papers, I don't know the reason.

 

[MomoGee]

It's always like this with all these papers, I don't know the reason.

The Brotzu pics were also like this. I wonder if there is a specific reason for doing taking the pictures like this.

 

[GiveMeAccessToMyAccount]

The Brotzu pics were also like this. I wonder if there is a specific reason for doing taking the pictures like this.

In a world where now smartphones come with pretty good cameras, it's a little crazy.

 

[FCKW36]

Do you rember the paper where they show strong regrowth from pig lard? The pictures had the same quality but it was huge regrowth so it was easy to notice. Also don't know why they always have this bad photo quality.

 

[yellowbluegrey]

I'm a photographer, the most logical reason I can think of for the picture quality is that they scaled them down to be used instead pdf (as in a journal or document) and then took the photos again from the same document; so they effectively reduced the quality of the photo by doing this. It's called compression, most likely has nothing to do with the camera used

 

[Xaser94]

Do you rember the paper where they show strong regrowth from pig lard? The pictures had the same quality but it was huge regrowth so it was easy to notice. Also don't know why they always have this bad photo quality.

http://cltri.gov.in/Pugazhendan/Beneficial Effect of Lard in Androgenic Alopecia.pdf

Damn that is some good regrowth lmaoo.

 

[FCKW36]

http://cltri.gov.in/Pugazhendan/Beneficial Effect of Lard in Androgenic Alopecia.pdf

Damn that is some good regrowth lmaoo.

Yes, from these photos you can call it "the cure".

 

[resu]

Yes, from these photos you can call it "the cure".

It's not, it's the old darkening trick, change the brightness and it's almost the same.

 

[FCKW36]

Dude you can't be for real. There is a giant bald spot on the first picture, NW5 or something and on the last picture the spot is gone.

Without light you don't have hair on your bald spots bro, I'm sorry to have to tell you.