Revivogen Vs. Products Like Procerin

G

Guest

Guest
Why is it that when someone mentions products like procerin, which is ultimately nothing more than saw palmetto, everyone says "SCAM" or "RIPOFF" while Revivogen is widely accepted and is even pimped by this website? Revivogen is a saw palmetto product too.
 

HairlossTalk

Senior Member
Reaction score
7
Fools? Hmm.

"fool (fool) noun"

1. One who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding.
2. Archaic. A mentally deficient person; an idiot.

What would the definition be of someone who is deficient in understanding of the differences between Revivogen and Procerin?

Anyways...

Revivogen's most influential ingredients have nothing to do with Saw Palmetto. I would go into it further, but if I type it again I may vomit. Please read about Revivogen:

http://www.hairlosstalk.com/productrevi ... icle01.htm
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/productrevi ... icle02.htm

HairLossTalk.com
 
G

Guest

Guest
The fool thing was a joke. Anyway, procerin has many other ingredients which they say help besides the saw palmetto too, but its a scam? I still dont understand why it is and revivogen isnt. Both are expensive, both have saw palmetto as a key ingredient, neither have scientific trials backing them up. But ones legit and the others a scam. Seems a bit strange to me.
 

HairlossTalk

Senior Member
Reaction score
7
First off, actually read the Revivogen pages I linked you to above.

Secondly, compare whats in Revivogen to whats in Procerin.

The pages above list Revivogen's ingredients and the mountains of clinical studies done on them in relation to affecting some known cause of hair loss.

How about Procerin?

It has Saw Palmetto. We already know Saw Palmetto has not been shown to do anything to help hair loss, and has even failed in studies directly monitoring its effect on hair.

Procerins other ingredients are the key then you say. What are they?

Zinc. Availble in a multivitamin.
Magnesium. Available in a multivitamin
Herbs. Nettles, Pumkin Seed, Siberian Ginseng, Yohimbe, Muira Puma Root, Uwa Ursi.

Show me the studies for these ingredients?

When you have a product creator that has made something that contains nothing other than Vitamins and herbs .... and then you see web sites selling the product that call it the "Cure to Hair Loss" and actually rating it as *MORE EFFECTIVE* than Propecia (look at this neat page where Propecia is actually rated as less effective than both Procerin and Hair Genesis: http://www.consumer-review.net/hair-loss.html )..... in other words... when you see these people blatantly lying to consumers just to get a sale .... and you combine that with a bunch of totally ineffective ingredients .... this is how products get labeled snake oils.

If you are still confused as to why Revivogen doens't fit into this category, then you have not read the Revivogen pages yet, read about all the studies, the extremely potent fatty acids it contains, the number of studies done on them in relation to DHT when topically applied, and the fact that the Revivogen web site and its team actually adheres to FDA guidelines and doesn't lie to consumers with outrageous claims just to get a sale.

The difference here is a group of actual physicians who work for Revivogen actually wanting to create an alternative product that might actually help people by pouring the most potent, studied ingredients into a product .... versus a bunch of non-doctors who either really believe vitamins are the cure to hair loss, or are knowingly lying to people just to get money.
HairLossTalk.com
 

global

Experienced Member
Reaction score
7
Like Hairsite said its the individual ingredients in Revivogen which are proven not the product itself.

There is plenty of those studies on the research section of this site.
 
Top