I am a twin. I wear a hairpiece, and my brother transplants. About 50,000 dollars later for him - he is all scarred up - but - not a bad result. Certainly looks better than me without my hair, but, the texture of the scalp looks irritated, blotchy - and this is by one of the best hair transplant doctors in the US - (I'll keep the name anonymous). Hairpieces are a pain in the *** and if you can't get the blend right, color right and maintain - it's a give away on top of being a pain in the *** - plus it's never comfortable after day one when applying tape or glue because of the melting factor. The big "BUT" is - when it's all right - it's like you never lost your hair - full coverage and the end point is achieved (look like I never lost my hair).
My philosophy is this - the goal is to look "real". To have a wig on or a hair transplant that looks stupid - is defeating the purpose of looking good. Some people should just shave - others should get a HP, and others a transplant. You have to know what works best and looks best. A military haircut is always in style and that's an option that could work.
A Norwood 7 and a hair transplant is "what's the point". I don't get that. Better off military cut or do the full wig. Honestly, Shatner's piece looks incredible in the sense that it looks real, it's not obsene. Sure, it doesn't blow in the wind, it's the same style - but it looks fine.
I'm in Norwood 5ish area. I could go either way. In hair - I pass for my 20's (I'm in my 40's) and without it - I look like I'm in my 30's (baby face) - but - chicks aren't looking to have me in their beds without the hair. Yeah, some don't care - but there is more to attraction then hair - it's the confidence, the body and the life. So......
The point of all ths is - figure out what will make you look best. Just having hair on the head doesn't qualify how good you look. Kevin Costner still gets laid I'm sure. Probably more than Walter Matthow (spelling?) and he had a crap load of hair. A marine will usually always get tail. So.....