Anyone who knows how to use google scholar can find plenty of articles on PRP's efficacy in treating Androgenetic Alopecia
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09546634.2016.1179712
The one above is a meta analysis looking at all trials so far conducted and what does it conclude... PRP works in halting hair loss and thickening up thin follicles!!
Clinical trials are obviously vastly more important and reliable sources of information than anecdotal evidence for anyone looking to investigate any type of treatment for various conditions.
People on hair loss forums complaining PRP is all crap just cant be weighted against hard clinical evidence which proves it works (when done properly)
Yet I and most others who report on having PRP report it as completely useless?!
Im completely baffled as to why clinics are screwing up these procedures and producing such crappy results.
If science can produce a treatment that works under scrutiny yet when marketed commercially it turns to complete bollocks then i have even less faith in the hair loss industry than i already did!!
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09546634.2016.1179712
The one above is a meta analysis looking at all trials so far conducted and what does it conclude... PRP works in halting hair loss and thickening up thin follicles!!
Clinical trials are obviously vastly more important and reliable sources of information than anecdotal evidence for anyone looking to investigate any type of treatment for various conditions.
People on hair loss forums complaining PRP is all crap just cant be weighted against hard clinical evidence which proves it works (when done properly)
Yet I and most others who report on having PRP report it as completely useless?!
Im completely baffled as to why clinics are screwing up these procedures and producing such crappy results.
If science can produce a treatment that works under scrutiny yet when marketed commercially it turns to complete bollocks then i have even less faith in the hair loss industry than i already did!!