After you get done insulting me, go re-check who has been saying what about which program.
No
I'm not the one bashing Follica. I think they are probably our best near-term hope for anything and I'm convinced they will be offering more than dermarolling+minoxidil level results. I have always been saying this.
My mistake, I apologize
The worst thing I have said about Tsuji is that it's not smart to assume he has solved the cell induction problems based on some "I think I've got it" word in the grapevine.
I don't apologize for this. It's not some "grapevine" that's saying this, it's the people involved in the research and bringing the treatment to market.
I do bash Replicel. They have a history of selling themselves hard
So what should a company whose existence depends entirely on investor funds do, exactly? Sell themselves lightly?
Okay, correct me. I may indeed be wrong.
I will freely admit I gleaned that info from other people's discussions of what was going on, rather than reading all the Replicel releases/news sources myself.
You know, I'm glad you bring this up because this further adds to my case that people who just come to the New Research Forums to cry and whine should be banned because as I've often pointed out, they almost always spread misinformation along with it.
Anyway, the data you're talking about from back then was incomplete, but of course they hyped it up because it was the company's first (and only data for the next five years) data reveal ever. The follow up data, five years later, is more compelling but stock still dropped because investors are displeased with how long it will take for the next trials to begin.