Ot: Study: Women: "80% Of Men Ugly/ 10% Avg/ 10% Attractive

[SmoothSailing]

I think you are a very pragmatic person and man. Not all men (or people) are like this.

it was in context to previous poster.

I am talking about men who wish it was still 1950s and women had pressure to be married.

those women 'settled' mostly to be married young..it was not like 'hey what do you want to do when you grow up?" it was "what kind of man do you want to marry when you grow up?' mentality.
It was expected to be married by 23.

So men who say 'i want those times back' they want to be at a time when women were pressured by society to 'settle'

It was not that women were more physically attracted to these men. These women 'had' to get married or feel ostracized...they could choose not to be married but they were also choosing to go against grain (most people are not that strong to do so.)

anyway I think men who are struggling now in 2017 to have a woman--who are saying if it was 1950s I would be married--they need to understand it would not be because they were more 'desirable' to the woman they married it would be because women were desperate and had less alternative options...not by nature but by society.

IF they want to pretend otherwise it would be an illusion....

The reality is if they want that--they can still have it via making money/status to get a gold digger..its still a woman choosing a man for settling for 'security' over 'looks'.

Very true. Many guys who do poor in "looks" wish "security" was a more important attribute.

 

[SmoothSailing]

I think you are a very pragmatic person and man. Not all men (or people) are like this.

it was in context to previous poster.

I am talking about men who wish it was still 1950s and women had pressure to be married.

those women 'settled' mostly to be married young..it was not like 'hey what do you want to do when you grow up?" it was "what kind of man do you want to marry when you grow up?' mentality.
It was expected to be married by 23.

So men who say 'i want those times back' they want to be at a time when women were pressured by society to 'settle'

It was not that women were more physically attracted to these men. These women 'had' to get married or feel ostracized...they could choose not to be married but they were also choosing to go against grain (most people are not that strong to do so.)

anyway I think men who are struggling now in 2017 to have a woman--who are saying if it was 1950s I would be married--they need to understand it would not be because they were more 'desirable' to the woman they married it would be because women were desperate and had less alternative options...not by nature but by society.

IF they want to pretend otherwise it would be an illusion....

The reality is if they want that--they can still have it via making money/status to get a gold digger..its still a woman choosing a man for settling for 'security' over 'looks'.

Very true. Many guys who do poor in "looks" wish "security" was a more important attribute.

 

[Dench57]

Very true. Many guys who do poor in "looks" wish "security" was a more important attribute.

fuckin feminism

bring back the 50s

 

[SmoothSailing]

fuckin feminism

bring back the 50s

My all time favorite 4chan.

 

[Señor AIDidaS]

Bring back the 16th century 50s

View attachment 59765

 

[Señor AIDidaS]

Ahh, islam is so refreshing for western civilization.

(p.s.: you know I was kidding with that meme, right?).

Lol yeah I know. I said it before, but I never get to use Memri TV quotes, and this thread has a lot of good opportunities. They have sh*t like this.

 

[HankPentagon]

You are correct. It's a poisoned chalice to be deemed "good enough" (but not GREAT like Chad) by women. If anyone "settles" for you, they already don't respect you. They already have classified you as beta. It's a case of "you'll have to do, but I'm dreaming about Chad". In a way, and believing your words and that you do NOT have a severe case of BDD but are indeed as ugly as you say you are....you have avoided a lot of pain and suffering. In chess, when not making a move is the most advantageous situation, it's called zugzwang. Zugzwang (not making a move) is a decent strategy in the modern dating game. There is no neutral position. It's not true that dating is better than not-dating. It really depends. And many people end up in nightmare situations because they sought validation through dating.

This is not true, and really cynical

There is true love, and its not based just on looks

I was married and i didnt fall in love with someone "hotter" than my wife

I didnt SETTLE for anybody

she didnt settle for me

 

[JeanLucBB]

This is a prerequisite to any healthy relationship: you have to be the best guy your girlfriend has ever had.

If that's not the case, the relationship is doomed.

Doom and gloom.

I never really considered this directly but it's probably why I've never felt comfortable getting into a long term relationship. Too much worrying about being a total c*** with a norwood 3.

Whenever there is a girl I think is amazing, I always think about how I could never be best for her because I am balding and such a pessimistic troll all the time. And if I actually was the best she could get, then maybe she isn't good enough for me because how could someone whos best was a negative and whiny norwood 3 with 5-6/10 looks be a high quality woman? f*** life.

 

[redpilled]

This is not true, and really cynical

There is true love, and its not based just on looks

I was married and i didnt fall in love with someone "hotter" than my wife

I didnt SETTLE for anybody

she didnt settle for me

Are you still married to her? You sound like you're single now.

 

[sonero9]

Attractive is different to handsome. There are attractive ugly women and men.

 

[genetically_cursed]

Attractive is different to handsome. There are attractive ugly women and men.

what you just wrote, made no sense at all